Verifying Out of Alarm, or Alarmed After Verification? A Three-Wave Cross-Lagged Analysis of Multidimensional Risk Perceptions and Verification Behavior Amid Climate Misinformation in China

Risk communication research often assumes that heightened risk perception drives subsequent behavioral responses, yet this perception-to-behavior logic remains underexamined. This study differentiates personal-level and societal-level risk perception and investigates their reciprocal associations with verification behavior in the context of climate change misinformation. Using three-wave panel data from China and cross-lagged structural equation modeling, results reveal a clear asymmetry: neither type of risk perception predicted subsequent verification. Instead, verification consistently increased societal risk perception over time, but not personal-level risk perception. These findings challenge the linear perception-to-behavior assumption and highlight a behavior-to-perception feedback pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Communication
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470261489553
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Verifying Out of Alarm, or Alarmed After Verification? A Three-Wave Cross-Lagged Analysis of Multidimensional Risk Perceptions and Verification Behavior Amid Climate Misinformation in China

Liang Chen, Lunrui Fu, Xiaoming Liu
Science Communication
Risk Perception and Management
article

Verifying Out of Alarm, or Alarmed After Verification? A Three-Wave Cross-Lagged Analysis of Multidimensional Risk Perceptions and Verification Behavior Amid Climate Misinformation in China

Liang Chen, Lunrui Fu, Xiaoming Liu
article en

Abstract

Risk communication research often assumes that heightened risk perception drives subsequent behavioral responses, yet this perception-to-behavior logic remains underexamined. This study differentiates personal-level and societal-level risk perception and investigates their reciprocal associations with verification behavior in the context of climate change misinformation. Using three-wave panel data from China and cross-lagged structural equation modeling, results reveal a clear asymmetry: neither type of risk perception predicted subsequent verification. Instead, verification consistently increased societal risk perception over time, but not personal-level risk perception. These findings challenge the linear perception-to-behavior assumption and highlight a behavior-to-perception feedback pathway.

Science Communication
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Tsinghua University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Risk Perception and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Verifying Out of Alarm, or Alarmed After Verification? A Three-Wave Cross-Lagged Analysis of Multidimensional Risk Perceptions and Verification Behavior Amid Climate Misinformation in China — Liang Chen, Lunrui Fu, et al. · Science Communication (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS