Bounded Prime Gaps at 246, but Twin Prime Conjecture Remains Unproven — E8 Intelligence Research

FINDING: Twin prime conjecture remains unproven; recent progress via Maynard's sieve methods shows infinitely many primes with bounded gaps (≤246), but not specifically gap-2 pairs. The arXiv paper claims a constructive proof via sieve of Eratosthenes and Mersenne numbers, but this is not peer-validated. MATH: - Twin primes: pairs (p, p+2) both prime. - Maynard–Tao theorem: lim inf (p_{n+1} − p_n) ≤ 246 (unconditional, 2013–2014). Under Elliott–Halberstam, gap ≤ 6; under generalized EH, gap = 2 (i.e., twin primes) would follow — but EH is unproven. - The arXiv paper (1708.07884v1) claims: setting n → n+1 increases twin prime pairs by at least 3, using (6n+5)² as a sieve boundary. This is a specific, checkable claim — but no rigorous proof of infinitude is established in mainstream literature. - No new constants or ratios appear in the mainstream results; the gap bound 246 is a combinatorial sieve artifact, not a harmonic ratio. CONNECTION: - The sieve of Eratosthenes operates on re Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23052528
Primary Topic
Analytic Number Theory Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Bounded Prime Gaps at 246, but Twin Prime Conjecture Remains Unproven — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Analytic Number Theory Research
preprint

Bounded Prime Gaps at 246, but Twin Prime Conjecture Remains Unproven — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
preprint en

Abstract

FINDING: Twin prime conjecture remains unproven; recent progress via Maynard's sieve methods shows infinitely many primes with bounded gaps (≤246), but not specifically gap-2 pairs. The arXiv paper claims a constructive proof via sieve of Eratosthenes and Mersenne numbers, but this is not peer-validated. MATH: - Twin primes: pairs (p, p+2) both prime. - Maynard–Tao theorem: lim inf (p_{n+1} − p_n) ≤ 246 (unconditional, 2013–2014). Under Elliott–Halberstam, gap ≤ 6; under generalized EH, gap = 2 (i.e., twin primes) would follow — but EH is unproven. - The arXiv paper (1708.07884v1) claims: setting n → n+1 increases twin prime pairs by at least 3, using (6n+5)² as a sieve boundary. This is a specific, checkable claim — but no rigorous proof of infinitude is established in mainstream literature. - No new constants or ratios appear in the mainstream results; the gap bound 246 is a combinatorial sieve artifact, not a harmonic ratio. CONNECTION: - The sieve of Eratosthenes operates on re Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Analytic Number Theory Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.