Prior victimization and self‐reported misconduct in prison: Examining the moderating role of correctional staff procedural justice

Abstract Purpose This study examines whether correctional staff procedural justice moderates the relationship between prior victimization and institutional misconduct. Specifically, we investigate whether perceptions of fair and respectful treatment by prison staff can mitigate the increased risk of misconduct among those with prior victimization experiences. Methods Consisting of 1514 respondents, this study used the first wave of data from the Prison Project, a national investigation of the consequences of detention in the Netherlands. The study sample consisted of incarcerated men, age 18–65 and born in the Netherlands. To test our hypotheses, we conducted regression analyses and examined the interaction between perceptions of procedural justice and prior victimization experiences on in‐prison misconduct. Results The results suggest that when people in prison perceive staff interactions as procedurally just, the risk of misconduct among previously victimized individuals is significantly diminished. Conclusions These findings underscore the practical importance of implementing procedural justice practices in correctional settings, particularly for vulnerable populations with histories of victimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70067
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Prior victimization and self‐reported misconduct in prison: Examining the moderating role of correctional staff procedural justice

James Vance Ray, Thomas Baker, Matthias van Hall
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Prior victimization and self‐reported misconduct in prison: Examining the moderating role of correctional staff procedural justice

James Vance Ray, Thomas Baker, Matthias van Hall
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study examines whether correctional staff procedural justice moderates the relationship between prior victimization and institutional misconduct. Specifically, we investigate whether perceptions of fair and respectful treatment by prison staff can mitigate the increased risk of misconduct among those with prior victimization experiences. Methods Consisting of 1514 respondents, this study used the first wave of data from the Prison Project, a national investigation of the consequences of detention in the Netherlands. The study sample consisted of incarcerated men, age 18–65 and born in the Netherlands. To test our hypotheses, we conducted regression analyses and examined the interaction between perceptions of procedural justice and prior victimization experiences on in‐prison misconduct. Results The results suggest that when people in prison perceive staff interactions as procedurally just, the risk of misconduct among previously victimized individuals is significantly diminished. Conclusions These findings underscore the practical importance of implementing procedural justice practices in correctional settings, particularly for vulnerable populations with histories of victimization.

Legal and Criminological Psychology
University of Central Florida (US), Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prior victimization and self‐reported misconduct in prison: Examining the moderating role of correctional staff procedural justice — James Vance Ray, Thomas Baker, et al. · Legal and Criminological Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS