Geographic Accessibility of Burn Centers in the United States

Importance Timely access to verified burn centers is associated with improved survival and functional outcomes after severe burn injury, yet no contemporary study has jointly characterized county-level burn center access, rural-urban gradients, and socioeconomic disparities using updated burn center data. Objective To estimate county-level drive time to the nearest verified burn center across the contiguous US and to characterize regional, rural-urban, and income-related disparities in access. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a cross-sectional, population-based geospatial analysis of counties in the contiguous US, including Washington, DC. Data were from 2020 population-weighted county centroids, geocoded verified burn center locations from the American Burn Association and BurnSurvivor.com directories, 2020 Rural-Urban Commuting Area classifications, and 2022 American Community Survey median household income. Data were analyzed December 2025. Exposures County rural-urban classification (metropolitan, micropolitan, small town, and rural) and US census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). Main Outcomes and Measures Road-network drive time from each county’s population-weighted centroid to the nearest verified burn center, estimated using the Google Maps Distance Matrix API; unweighted and population-weighted mean and median drive times nationally and by region; proportion of counties and population with drive times exceeding 2 and 4 hours; and the association between drive time and median household income. Results Among 3109 counties (population, 329 260 619), the unweighted mean (SD) drive time was 1.96 (1.47) hours (median [IQR], 1.61 [1.02-2.39] hours) vs a population-weighted mean of 0.92 hours (median, 0.59 hours). Overall, 1107 counties (35.6%; 10.8% of the population) had drive times exceeding 2 hours, and 266 counties (8.6%; 1.7% of the population) exceeded 4 hours. The West had the greatest drive time burden (mean [SD], 3.08 [2.10] hours; 262 of 414 counties [63.3%] >2 hours) and the Northeast the least burden (mean [SD], 1.24 [0.74] hours; 35 of 218 counties [16.1%] >2 hours). Rural and small town counties had longer median drive times (1.76 [IQR, 1.26-2.53] hours and 2.18 [IQR, 1.54-3.27] hours, respectively) than metropolitan counties (0.86 [IQR, 0.47-1.58] hours). Lower income was associated with longer drive time nationally ( R 2 = 0.100) and regionally ( R 2 range, 0.070-0.273), most strongly in the West. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of 3109 US counties, substantial disparities in drive time access to verified burn centers existed, concentrated among rural, small town, and Western counties, and were attenuated, although not eliminated, when weighted by population. These findings may inform burn system regionalization, aeromedical transport planning, and telemedicine expansion for underserved areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.36854
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Geographic Accessibility of Burn Centers in the United States

Joshua Wang, Yousef Tanas, Sudhanvan Iyer, BaiJing Qin et al.
JAMA Network Open
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
article

Geographic Accessibility of Burn Centers in the United States

Joshua Wang, Yousef Tanas, Sudhanvan Iyer, BaiJing Qin, Philong Nguyen, Kamryn K Baker, Jong Lee, Steven E. Wolf
article en

Abstract

Importance Timely access to verified burn centers is associated with improved survival and functional outcomes after severe burn injury, yet no contemporary study has jointly characterized county-level burn center access, rural-urban gradients, and socioeconomic disparities using updated burn center data. Objective To estimate county-level drive time to the nearest verified burn center across the contiguous US and to characterize regional, rural-urban, and income-related disparities in access. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a cross-sectional, population-based geospatial analysis of counties in the contiguous US, including Washington, DC. Data were from 2020 population-weighted county centroids, geocoded verified burn center locations from the American Burn Association and BurnSurvivor.com directories, 2020 Rural-Urban Commuting Area classifications, and 2022 American Community Survey median household income. Data were analyzed December 2025. Exposures County rural-urban classification (metropolitan, micropolitan, small town, and rural) and US census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). Main Outcomes and Measures Road-network drive time from each county’s population-weighted centroid to the nearest verified burn center, estimated using the Google Maps Distance Matrix API; unweighted and population-weighted mean and median drive times nationally and by region; proportion of counties and population with drive times exceeding 2 and 4 hours; and the association between drive time and median household income. Results Among 3109 counties (population, 329 260 619), the unweighted mean (SD) drive time was 1.96 (1.47) hours (median [IQR], 1.61 [1.02-2.39] hours) vs a population-weighted mean of 0.92 hours (median, 0.59 hours). Overall, 1107 counties (35.6%; 10.8% of the population) had drive times exceeding 2 hours, and 266 counties (8.6%; 1.7% of the population) exceeded 4 hours. The West had the greatest drive time burden (mean [SD], 3.08 [2.10] hours; 262 of 414 counties [63.3%] >2 hours) and the Northeast the least burden (mean [SD], 1.24 [0.74] hours; 35 of 218 counties [16.1%] >2 hours). Rural and small town counties had longer median drive times (1.76 [IQR, 1.26-2.53] hours and 2.18 [IQR, 1.54-3.27] hours, respectively) than metropolitan counties (0.86 [IQR, 0.47-1.58] hours). Lower income was associated with longer drive time nationally ( R 2 = 0.100) and regionally ( R 2 range, 0.070-0.273), most strongly in the West. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of 3109 US counties, substantial disparities in drive time access to verified burn centers existed, concentrated among rural, small town, and Western counties, and were attenuated, although not eliminated, when weighted by population. These findings may inform burn system regionalization, aeromedical transport planning, and telemedicine expansion for underserved areas.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(9)
Cornell University (US), Shriners Hospitals for Children - Galveston (US), Methodist Hospital (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.