Light stimulation system for measuring pupillary light responses based on Maxwellian view optical system using a retina presentation type viewfinder

Abstract Background Melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) contribute predominantly to non-image-forming effects of light, such as light-induced circadian phase shift, melatonin suppression, and pupillary light reflex. Post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) has been well-used for the evaluation of ipRGC sensitivity for humans since it is able to detect ipRGC function independently from conventional cones. However, pharmacological mydriasis or a specialized light stimulation system, such as the Maxwellian view (MV) optical system, is required to avoid dynamic pupil constriction in the stimulated eye for effective PIPR measurements, which makes these approaches less practical and difficult to implement in standard experimental settings. In this context, we propose the application of a retinal projection viewfinder based on the MV system as a practical approach for measuring PIPR and evaluate the feasibility of this approach by comparing its performance with a typical LED-based optical system. Methods Twenty-two healthy participants underwent pupillometry using both the MV-based viewfinder and a typical LED-based system. Monochromatic red and blue light stimuli were presented for durations of 1 and 10 s. Pupil responses, including maximum constriction, PIPR amplitude after 6 s from the light offset, area under the curve (AUC) values of PIPR, and sustained slopes, were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model to assess the differences between the two systems. Results The MV-based viewfinder significantly enhanced net PIPR amplitude ( p < 0.05) and sustained slope ( p < 0.01) during 10-s light stimulation compared to the LED system, demonstrating its capability to effectively measure ipRGC-driven responses. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in the net AUC values. These results highlight that the MV-based viewfinder enables effective PIPR measurements by delivering constant and controlled light stimulation directly to the retina, minimizing the effects of dynamic pupil constriction during light stimulation. Conclusions The MV-based viewfinder showed feasibility as an effective method for measuring PIPR without requiring pharmacological dilation or complex optical instrumentation. This approach has strong potential for advancing the assessment of human ipRGC function using pupillary responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-026-00448-4
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Light stimulation system for measuring pupillary light responses based on Maxwellian view optical system using a retina presentation type viewfinder

Takuya Yoshiike, Aoi Kawamura, Tomohiro Utsumi, Kentaro Nagao et al.
Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
article

Light stimulation system for measuring pupillary light responses based on Maxwellian view optical system using a retina presentation type viewfinder

Takuya Yoshiike, Aoi Kawamura, Tomohiro Utsumi, Kentaro Nagao, Taisuke Eto, Shingo Kitamura, Kenichi Kuriyama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) contribute predominantly to non-image-forming effects of light, such as light-induced circadian phase shift, melatonin suppression, and pupillary light reflex. Post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) has been well-used for the evaluation of ipRGC sensitivity for humans since it is able to detect ipRGC function independently from conventional cones. However, pharmacological mydriasis or a specialized light stimulation system, such as the Maxwellian view (MV) optical system, is required to avoid dynamic pupil constriction in the stimulated eye for effective PIPR measurements, which makes these approaches less practical and difficult to implement in standard experimental settings. In this context, we propose the application of a retinal projection viewfinder based on the MV system as a practical approach for measuring PIPR and evaluate the feasibility of this approach by comparing its performance with a typical LED-based optical system. Methods Twenty-two healthy participants underwent pupillometry using both the MV-based viewfinder and a typical LED-based system. Monochromatic red and blue light stimuli were presented for durations of 1 and 10 s. Pupil responses, including maximum constriction, PIPR amplitude after 6 s from the light offset, area under the curve (AUC) values of PIPR, and sustained slopes, were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model to assess the differences between the two systems. Results The MV-based viewfinder significantly enhanced net PIPR amplitude ( p < 0.05) and sustained slope ( p < 0.01) during 10-s light stimulation compared to the LED system, demonstrating its capability to effectively measure ipRGC-driven responses. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in the net AUC values. These results highlight that the MV-based viewfinder enables effective PIPR measurements by delivering constant and controlled light stimulation directly to the retina, minimizing the effects of dynamic pupil constriction during light stimulation. Conclusions The MV-based viewfinder showed feasibility as an effective method for measuring PIPR without requiring pharmacological dilation or complex optical instrumentation. This approach has strong potential for advancing the assessment of human ipRGC function using pupillary responses.

Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP), Keio University Hospital (JP), Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.