Home and Peaceful Integration: The Ambiguous Experience of Home for UK Asylum Seekers

This paper asks whether the potential for peaceful integration of asylum seekers (and ultimately refugees) to make a legitimate claim to a new home in the UK exists. Based on extensive interviews with both asylum seekers and community voices as well as vox pops with local citizens, we find the answer to this question to be ambiguous. The ambiguity resides in the meaning of ‘home’ as both a deeply personal and private residence and a civil-political one. We argue two things: first, that asylum seekers’ ambiguous experience of home is best captured by distinguishing between four phases: (i) the loss of home: reasons for having to escape; (ii) forced exit: the journey as a struggle for survival in search of a new home; (iii) denial of home upon arrival in the UK; and (iv) a taste of home: community engagement and communicative peacebuilding. Second, we argue that it is civil resistance at local level to state domopolitics that bears the potential for peaceful integration and reveals the fundamental link between home and peaceful integration for asylum seekers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peace Studies
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/peacestud1040011
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Home and Peaceful Integration: The Ambiguous Experience of Home for UK Asylum Seekers

Stefanie Pukallus, Tom P. J. Parkin, Eugenie Mikail
Peace Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Home and Peaceful Integration: The Ambiguous Experience of Home for UK Asylum Seekers

Stefanie Pukallus, Tom P. J. Parkin, Eugenie Mikail
article en

Abstract

This paper asks whether the potential for peaceful integration of asylum seekers (and ultimately refugees) to make a legitimate claim to a new home in the UK exists. Based on extensive interviews with both asylum seekers and community voices as well as vox pops with local citizens, we find the answer to this question to be ambiguous. The ambiguity resides in the meaning of ‘home’ as both a deeply personal and private residence and a civil-political one. We argue two things: first, that asylum seekers’ ambiguous experience of home is best captured by distinguishing between four phases: (i) the loss of home: reasons for having to escape; (ii) forced exit: the journey as a struggle for survival in search of a new home; (iii) denial of home upon arrival in the UK; and (iv) a taste of home: community engagement and communicative peacebuilding. Second, we argue that it is civil resistance at local level to state domopolitics that bears the potential for peaceful integration and reveals the fundamental link between home and peaceful integration for asylum seekers.

Peace StudiesVol. 1(4)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.