Letermovir in Refractory and Resistant CMV After Lung Transplantation: Therapeutic Potential and Emergence of Resistance

ABSTRACT Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major challenge in lung transplant (LTx) recipients, particularly in antiviral‐resistant or refractory (R/R) cases. Letermovir, effective for prophylaxis, has been used off‐label as salvage therapy for R/R CMV infection; however, data on treatment‐emergent resistance in LTx recipients remain limited. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 61 consecutive LTx recipients treated with letermovir for R/R CMV infection between March 2018 and August 2024. Results Overall, 21 patients (35%) developed R/R CMV under therapy and were genotypically tested; in 19 (31.1%), UL56 mutations conferring letermovir resistance were detected after a median of 96 [51–395] days. In contrast, 40 patients (65.6%) showed a > 1 log decline in viral load within 14.5 [5–31] days and viral clearance after 34 [6–126] days. Patients who developed resistance had significantly higher viral loads at initiation (35.100 [13.900–228.000] vs. 7.805 [1.173–30.350] IU/mL; p = 0.018) and less frequent positive CMV‐specific immune responses (7.1% vs. 38.7%; p = 0.038). Time to 1 log decline was shorter in patients without resistance (16 [5–31] vs. 34 [17–58] days; p < 0.001). Multivariable regression identified slow viral load decline (OR 0.721; p < 0.001) and higher baseline viral load (OR 1.110; p = 0.044) as independent risk factors. Conclusion Letermovir use for active R/R CMV infection was associated with treatment‐emergent resistance in approximately one‐third of patients, particularly in those with high baseline viral loads and delayed virological response. These findings support cautious use of letermovir for treatment, preferably in selected patients with low viral loads or limited alternative therapeutic options, with close virological monitoring and early resistance testing. image

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplant Infectious Disease
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70324
Primary Topic
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Letermovir in Refractory and Resistant CMV After Lung Transplantation: Therapeutic Potential and Emergence of Resistance

Tobias Veit, Gabriela Leuschner, Carlo Mümmler, Nikolaus Kneidinger et al.
Transplant Infectious Disease
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
article

Letermovir in Refractory and Resistant CMV After Lung Transplantation: Therapeutic Potential and Emergence of Resistance

Tobias Veit, Gabriela Leuschner, Carlo Mümmler, Nikolaus Kneidinger, Michael Gerckens, Stefan Trost, Jürgen Behr, Teresa Kauke, Sebastian G. Michel, Nina Engels, Valeria Hackemann, Michael Zoller
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major challenge in lung transplant (LTx) recipients, particularly in antiviral‐resistant or refractory (R/R) cases. Letermovir, effective for prophylaxis, has been used off‐label as salvage therapy for R/R CMV infection; however, data on treatment‐emergent resistance in LTx recipients remain limited. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 61 consecutive LTx recipients treated with letermovir for R/R CMV infection between March 2018 and August 2024. Results Overall, 21 patients (35%) developed R/R CMV under therapy and were genotypically tested; in 19 (31.1%), UL56 mutations conferring letermovir resistance were detected after a median of 96 [51–395] days. In contrast, 40 patients (65.6%) showed a > 1 log decline in viral load within 14.5 [5–31] days and viral clearance after 34 [6–126] days. Patients who developed resistance had significantly higher viral loads at initiation (35.100 [13.900–228.000] vs. 7.805 [1.173–30.350] IU/mL; p = 0.018) and less frequent positive CMV‐specific immune responses (7.1% vs. 38.7%; p = 0.038). Time to 1 log decline was shorter in patients without resistance (16 [5–31] vs. 34 [17–58] days; p < 0.001). Multivariable regression identified slow viral load decline (OR 0.721; p < 0.001) and higher baseline viral load (OR 1.110; p = 0.044) as independent risk factors. Conclusion Letermovir use for active R/R CMV infection was associated with treatment‐emergent resistance in approximately one‐third of patients, particularly in those with high baseline viral loads and delayed virological response. These findings support cautious use of letermovir for treatment, preferably in selected patients with low viral loads or limited alternative therapeutic options, with close virological monitoring and early resistance testing. image

Transplant Infectious Disease
Medical University of Graz (AT), Helmholtz Zentrum München (DE), German Center for Lung Research (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.