E-skin for human–robot interaction: tactile sensing and edge computing architectures

Electronic skin (E-skin) has been a key enabling technology for robots that need to work safely, intelligently, and in physical proximity with humans. The domain has progressed from fingertip tactile arrays to large-area, full-body systems that can now sense pressure, shear, high-frequency vibration, proximity (i.e., the distinct sensation of “touching” another body), temperature, and even social touch. In this article, we showcase the architectural bottlenecks, material science challenges, and embedded computing requirements that influence whether E-skin can transition from laboratory prototypes to deployable robotic systems. From our analysis, we showcase that none of the currently available transduction principles satisfy all requirements of spatial resolution, conformability, low latency, low cost, calibration stability, and mechanical robustness. Capacitive and time-of-flight methods improve pre-touch awareness, pneumatic and barometric schemes enhance coverage and low cost, and tomographic approaches and row–column strategies reduce wiring, while deep learning techniques enable semantic recognition of human tactile gestures. Simultaneously, this paper claims that the next E-skin trends will be built on top of heterogeneous architectures composed of soft materials, distributed sensor nodes, deterministic safety loops, and edge computing platforms based on Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Onion Omega, and NVIDIA Jetson devices alike. Lastly, two comparative tables and a scoping process informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were used to clarify the evidence base and technological trade-offs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Engineering
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/acadeng8543
Primary Topic
Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

E-skin for human–robot interaction: tactile sensing and edge computing architectures

Erietta Chamalidou, Theodoros Vavouras, Στυλιανός Παππάς, Alexandros Gazis et al.
Academia Engineering
Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
article

E-skin for human–robot interaction: tactile sensing and edge computing architectures

Erietta Chamalidou, Theodoros Vavouras, Στυλιανός Παππάς, Alexandros Gazis, Ioannis Papadongonas, Nikos E. Mastorakis, Vasileios Fanidis, Christos Douvlos
article en

Abstract

Electronic skin (E-skin) has been a key enabling technology for robots that need to work safely, intelligently, and in physical proximity with humans. The domain has progressed from fingertip tactile arrays to large-area, full-body systems that can now sense pressure, shear, high-frequency vibration, proximity (i.e., the distinct sensation of “touching” another body), temperature, and even social touch. In this article, we showcase the architectural bottlenecks, material science challenges, and embedded computing requirements that influence whether E-skin can transition from laboratory prototypes to deployable robotic systems. From our analysis, we showcase that none of the currently available transduction principles satisfy all requirements of spatial resolution, conformability, low latency, low cost, calibration stability, and mechanical robustness. Capacitive and time-of-flight methods improve pre-touch awareness, pneumatic and barometric schemes enhance coverage and low cost, and tomographic approaches and row–column strategies reduce wiring, while deep learning techniques enable semantic recognition of human tactile gestures. Simultaneously, this paper claims that the next E-skin trends will be built on top of heterogeneous architectures composed of soft materials, distributed sensor nodes, deterministic safety loops, and edge computing platforms based on Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Onion Omega, and NVIDIA Jetson devices alike. Lastly, two comparative tables and a scoping process informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were used to clarify the evidence base and technological trade-offs.

Academia EngineeringVol. 3(3)
Democritus University of Thrace (GR), Hellenic Naval Academy (GR), National Technical University of Athens (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Hellenic Open University (GR), Paphos General Hospital (CY), Technical University of Sofia (BG), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.