Unfit Mothers Only: Medical Gatekeeping of Second‐ and Third‐Trimester Abortion in France

ABSTRACT Background In France, abortion is available without restriction as to reason until 14 weeks of pregnancy. Beyond this limit, medical authorization is required and “medical termination of pregnancy” is permitted for fetal malformation or serious danger to the woman's health, including from “psychosocial distress.” Little is known about how professionals interpret psychosocial distress criteria and which women are deemed eligible. Methods This study is based on 6 months of ethnographic fieldwork (2021–2022) in two French university hospital maternity wards. Data collection included observations of abortion care, 12 multidisciplinary team meetings, and interviews with 25 healthcare professionals (gynecologists, general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, and midwives). Analysis of case files from 27 past medical termination of pregnancy requests provided additional data. Results Healthcare professionals pathologized reproductive nonconformity by constructing certain women as unfit for motherhood based on intersecting marginalization—class, racialization, age, disability, and family structure. Approval depended on intersecting characteristics distancing women from the “good mother” norm: poverty, violent relationships, incarceration, substance use, and psychiatric diagnosis. Professionals medicalized social inequality while regulating abortion seekers' emotions and behaviors. Gynecologists invoked fetal interests to refuse requests and conditioned approval on long‐acting contraception or sterilization. Professional hierarchies shaped decisions, with gynecologists dominating. Conclusions Medical gatekeeping of second‐ and third‐trimester abortion care reinforces reproductive stratification by granting access primarily to marginalized women judged incapable of motherhood while subjecting them to contraceptive coercion. Physicians construct reproductive legitimacy through collective practices, transforming social and political issues into medical problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.70095
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Unfit Mothers Only: Medical Gatekeeping of Second‐ and Third‐Trimester Abortion in France

Raphaël Perrin
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Unfit Mothers Only: Medical Gatekeeping of Second‐ and Third‐Trimester Abortion in France

Raphaël Perrin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background In France, abortion is available without restriction as to reason until 14 weeks of pregnancy. Beyond this limit, medical authorization is required and “medical termination of pregnancy” is permitted for fetal malformation or serious danger to the woman's health, including from “psychosocial distress.” Little is known about how professionals interpret psychosocial distress criteria and which women are deemed eligible. Methods This study is based on 6 months of ethnographic fieldwork (2021–2022) in two French university hospital maternity wards. Data collection included observations of abortion care, 12 multidisciplinary team meetings, and interviews with 25 healthcare professionals (gynecologists, general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, and midwives). Analysis of case files from 27 past medical termination of pregnancy requests provided additional data. Results Healthcare professionals pathologized reproductive nonconformity by constructing certain women as unfit for motherhood based on intersecting marginalization—class, racialization, age, disability, and family structure. Approval depended on intersecting characteristics distancing women from the “good mother” norm: poverty, violent relationships, incarceration, substance use, and psychiatric diagnosis. Professionals medicalized social inequality while regulating abortion seekers' emotions and behaviors. Gynecologists invoked fetal interests to refuse requests and conditioned approval on long‐acting contraception or sterilization. Professional hierarchies shaped decisions, with gynecologists dominating. Conclusions Medical gatekeeping of second‐ and third‐trimester abortion care reinforces reproductive stratification by granting access primarily to marginalized women judged incapable of motherhood while subjecting them to contraceptive coercion. Physicians construct reproductive legitimacy through collective practices, transforming social and political issues into medical problems.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Inserm (FR), Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire sur les Enjeux Sociaux (FR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.