Who Defines the Margin? Dermatologist-Led Dermoscopy versus Plastic Surgeon–Led Clinical Assessment in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer

Objectives: To compare preoperative diagnostic concordance and histopathological margin outcomes between two pathways for clinically suspected nonmelanoma skin cancer: assessment and margin marking by dermatologists using clinical examination and dermoscopy versus assessment and marking by plastic surgeons using clinical examination and guideline-based risk stratification. All excisions were performed by the same plastic surgery team.Materials and Methods: This single-center, nonrandomized, prospective cohort study included patients presenting independently to Dermatology or to Plastic Surgery from December 2023 through December 2024 for primary excision of clinically suspicious lesions. After exclusions, 184 patients were analyzed: 100 in the dermatology pathway and 84 in the plastic surgery pathway. Comparisons used the Mann–Whitney U, chi-square, or Fisher exact test. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted margin positivity for age, tumor type, and anatomical site.Results: Diagnostic concordance was higher in dermatology pathway (63/70, 90.0%) than in plastic surgery pathway (41/60, 68.3%; risk difference 21.7 percentage points, 95% CI 8.0–35.4; OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.61–10.80; p=0.004). Positive margins occurred in 11/100 (11.0%) and 11/84 (13.1%), respectively (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.34–2.00; p=0.820), with no association after adjustment (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.34–2.16; p=0.747). The nearest lateral margin was wider in dermatology pathway (median 3.20 vs. 2.70 mm; p=0.027), but the difference became non-significant after excluding involved margins (p=0.053). Deep margins and tumor thickness were similar.Conclusion: Dermatologist-led preoperative assessment incorporating dermoscopy was associated with greater diagnostic concordance and in the primary analysis, wider lateral histopathological margins but not with a lower positive-margin rate. Because all excisions were performed by one surgical team, specialist preoperative assessment contributes principally to lesion characterization rather than to surgical clearance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65092/autfm.2026349
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Who Defines the Margin? Dermatologist-Led Dermoscopy versus Plastic Surgeon–Led Clinical Assessment in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer

Burak Kaya, Bengü Nisa Akay, Servet Elçin Alpat, Ali Açıkbaş
Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
article

Who Defines the Margin? Dermatologist-Led Dermoscopy versus Plastic Surgeon–Led Clinical Assessment in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer

Burak Kaya, Bengü Nisa Akay, Servet Elçin Alpat, Ali Açıkbaş
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To compare preoperative diagnostic concordance and histopathological margin outcomes between two pathways for clinically suspected nonmelanoma skin cancer: assessment and margin marking by dermatologists using clinical examination and dermoscopy versus assessment and marking by plastic surgeons using clinical examination and guideline-based risk stratification. All excisions were performed by the same plastic surgery team.Materials and Methods: This single-center, nonrandomized, prospective cohort study included patients presenting independently to Dermatology or to Plastic Surgery from December 2023 through December 2024 for primary excision of clinically suspicious lesions. After exclusions, 184 patients were analyzed: 100 in the dermatology pathway and 84 in the plastic surgery pathway. Comparisons used the Mann–Whitney U, chi-square, or Fisher exact test. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted margin positivity for age, tumor type, and anatomical site.Results: Diagnostic concordance was higher in dermatology pathway (63/70, 90.0%) than in plastic surgery pathway (41/60, 68.3%; risk difference 21.7 percentage points, 95% CI 8.0–35.4; OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.61–10.80; p=0.004). Positive margins occurred in 11/100 (11.0%) and 11/84 (13.1%), respectively (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.34–2.00; p=0.820), with no association after adjustment (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.34–2.16; p=0.747). The nearest lateral margin was wider in dermatology pathway (median 3.20 vs. 2.70 mm; p=0.027), but the difference became non-significant after excluding involved margins (p=0.053). Deep margins and tumor thickness were similar.Conclusion: Dermatologist-led preoperative assessment incorporating dermoscopy was associated with greater diagnostic concordance and in the primary analysis, wider lateral histopathological margins but not with a lower positive-margin rate. Because all excisions were performed by one surgical team, specialist preoperative assessment contributes principally to lesion characterization rather than to surgical clearance.

Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi MecmuasıVol. 79(3)
Ankara University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.