Effects of a Low‐Carbohydrate Diet Combined With Exercise on HbA1c in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Bayesian Multilevel Network and Dose–Response Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Background The relative benefits of carbohydrate‐restricted diets (CRDs) combined with exercise in adults with type 2 diabetes remain uncertain. We compared regimens and explored incremental benefits, dose–response associations and potential effect modifiers. Methods Four databases were searched from inception to 31 August 2026 for English‐language randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A Bayesian multilevel model synthesized arm‐level changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) across eligible post‐baseline assessments. An auxiliary frequentist network meta‐analysis evaluated network structure and inconsistency; Confidence in Network Meta‐Analysis (CINeMA) assessed 20 prespecified comparisons. Dose–response and moderator analyses were exploratory. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane tool for randomized trials. Results Twenty‐four RCTs involving 2038 participants were included. Compared with pooled active/passive controls, aerobic training plus a moderately low‐carbohydrate diet was associated with lower HbA1c (posterior median mean difference, −0.53 percentage points; 95% credible interval, −0.76 to −0.28). Estimates for other combined regimens were less precise. The auxiliary network had two disconnected components, and confidence was very low for all 20 assessed comparisons. Under the specified priors, the Bayes factor favoured the model without treatment‐specific effects (BF10 = 0.034). Higher prescribed exercise doses were associated with larger reductions versus pooled controls, but an incremental benefit over exercise or CRD alone was not established. Matched carbohydrate‐dose contrasts were imprecise. Conclusions Limitations of the arm‐level model, sparse evidence and very low confidence in the assessed auxiliary‐network comparisons leave comparative benefits uncertain. The findings do not establish a preferred regimen, an incremental benefit over either component alone, or a specific dietary or exercise prescription.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71406
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effects of a Low‐Carbohydrate Diet Combined With Exercise on HbA1c in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Bayesian Multilevel Network and Dose–Response Meta‐Analysis

Xiaotong Wang, Mingyue Jiao, Wenzheng Ma
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Diet and metabolism studies
article

Effects of a Low‐Carbohydrate Diet Combined With Exercise on HbA1c in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Bayesian Multilevel Network and Dose–Response Meta‐Analysis

Xiaotong Wang, Mingyue Jiao, Wenzheng Ma
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The relative benefits of carbohydrate‐restricted diets (CRDs) combined with exercise in adults with type 2 diabetes remain uncertain. We compared regimens and explored incremental benefits, dose–response associations and potential effect modifiers. Methods Four databases were searched from inception to 31 August 2026 for English‐language randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A Bayesian multilevel model synthesized arm‐level changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) across eligible post‐baseline assessments. An auxiliary frequentist network meta‐analysis evaluated network structure and inconsistency; Confidence in Network Meta‐Analysis (CINeMA) assessed 20 prespecified comparisons. Dose–response and moderator analyses were exploratory. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane tool for randomized trials. Results Twenty‐four RCTs involving 2038 participants were included. Compared with pooled active/passive controls, aerobic training plus a moderately low‐carbohydrate diet was associated with lower HbA1c (posterior median mean difference, −0.53 percentage points; 95% credible interval, −0.76 to −0.28). Estimates for other combined regimens were less precise. The auxiliary network had two disconnected components, and confidence was very low for all 20 assessed comparisons. Under the specified priors, the Bayes factor favoured the model without treatment‐specific effects (BF10 = 0.034). Higher prescribed exercise doses were associated with larger reductions versus pooled controls, but an incremental benefit over exercise or CRD alone was not established. Matched carbohydrate‐dose contrasts were imprecise. Conclusions Limitations of the arm‐level model, sparse evidence and very low confidence in the assessed auxiliary‐network comparisons leave comparative benefits uncertain. The findings do not establish a preferred regimen, an incremental benefit over either component alone, or a specific dietary or exercise prescription.

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Taiyuan Normal University (CN), Shandong Management University (CN), Shanxi Normal University (CN), Hezhou University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diet and metabolism studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.