Frechet ChemNet Distance Is Blind to Double-Bond Stereochemistry

Abstract Fréchet ChemNet Distance (FCD) cannot distinguish E/Z stereoisomers, because the ChemNet tokenizer maps the SMILES bond-direction symbols / and \ to the same unknown token; inverting every double-bond configuration in MolT5-large’s ChEBI-20 output (384 molecules altered) changes FCD by 0.001 resampling standard deviations while conditional per-bond accuracy falls from 98.97% to 1.03%, and MOSES and GuacaMol cannot expose the defect because their benchmark data contain no stereochemistry. A stereochemistry-aware correction is monotone under synthetic corruption yet prefers fully inverted real output, illustrating that a metric operating only on unpaired generated and reference embeddings cannot recover per-caption correctness. Across real generators FCD carries no dependable signal about a more-than-3-fold difference in E/Z recall: on the double bonds where MolT5-large and BioT5-base both recover the molecular skeleton, recall is 0.26 versus 0.997, yet FCD does not separate the two models─its ordering is statistically borderline, with a bootstrap interval that crosses zero. The failure is one of uninformativeness rather than of reversal. Where paired conditional references exist, stereochemistry should be reported directly, as coverage, precision, and recall, rather than inferred from a distributional score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c02441
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Frechet ChemNet Distance Is Blind to Double-Bond Stereochemistry

Jinseong Yim
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Frechet ChemNet Distance Is Blind to Double-Bond Stereochemistry

Jinseong Yim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fréchet ChemNet Distance (FCD) cannot distinguish E/Z stereoisomers, because the ChemNet tokenizer maps the SMILES bond-direction symbols / and \ to the same unknown token; inverting every double-bond configuration in MolT5-large’s ChEBI-20 output (384 molecules altered) changes FCD by 0.001 resampling standard deviations while conditional per-bond accuracy falls from 98.97% to 1.03%, and MOSES and GuacaMol cannot expose the defect because their benchmark data contain no stereochemistry. A stereochemistry-aware correction is monotone under synthetic corruption yet prefers fully inverted real output, illustrating that a metric operating only on unpaired generated and reference embeddings cannot recover per-caption correctness. Across real generators FCD carries no dependable signal about a more-than-3-fold difference in E/Z recall: on the double bonds where MolT5-large and BioT5-base both recover the molecular skeleton, recall is 0.26 versus 0.997, yet FCD does not separate the two models─its ordering is statistically borderline, with a bootstrap interval that crosses zero. The failure is one of uninformativeness rather than of reversal. Where paired conditional references exist, stereochemistry should be reported directly, as coverage, precision, and recall, rather than inferred from a distributional score.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Kyung Hee University (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Frechet ChemNet Distance Is Blind to Double-Bond Stereochemistry — Jinseong Yim · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS