On the Externality of State of Affairs Unification

Abstract This paper examines what it means for the relation of unification in states of affairs to be external. I begin by introducing a tripartite, necessitation-based classification of relations into strongly internal, weakly internal, and external, and consider how it applies to the unification relation. I then focus on the version of this relation endorsed by self-relating internalism, according to which unification relates its relata by itself. Since standard necessity-based definitions of internal and external relations are not directly applicable to such a self-relating relation, I propose suitably modified counterparts. I argue that, even on these revised definitions, the unification relation comes out as external. Finally, assuming that this relation is identical to instantiation, I consider a novel argument against its externality – adapted from one of D.W. Mertz’s objections to bare particulars – and argue that it does not succeed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophia
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-026-01040-x
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

On the Externality of State of Affairs Unification

Bo Rode Meinertsen
Philosophia
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

On the Externality of State of Affairs Unification

Bo Rode Meinertsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines what it means for the relation of unification in states of affairs to be external. I begin by introducing a tripartite, necessitation-based classification of relations into strongly internal, weakly internal, and external, and consider how it applies to the unification relation. I then focus on the version of this relation endorsed by self-relating internalism, according to which unification relates its relata by itself. Since standard necessity-based definitions of internal and external relations are not directly applicable to such a self-relating relation, I propose suitably modified counterparts. I argue that, even on these revised definitions, the unification relation comes out as external. Finally, assuming that this relation is identical to instantiation, I consider a novel argument against its externality – adapted from one of D.W. Mertz’s objections to bare particulars – and argue that it does not succeed.

Philosophia
University of Sheffield (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.