The University as a Site of Agonistic Democracy: Rethinking Pluralism Amid Cultural and Political Conflict

This article reimagines the modern university as a site of agonistic democracy, a political space where disagreement and contestation are treated as essential conditions of democratic vitality rather than problems to be managed. Against the backdrop of intensifying culture wars, debates over academic freedom, and escalating protest politics, it critiques the liberal-deliberative model of the university, which often relies on neutrality, consensus, and procedural regulation to suppress dissent. Built on the agonistic conceptions of Mouffe and Connolly, the article develops a normative model of the “agonistic university,” showing how structured ideological conflict can be institutionalised to protect dissent, foster radical forms of democratic engagement, and channel ideological disputes constructively. This framework contributes to both democratic theory and higher education reform.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Minerva
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-026-09664-9
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The University as a Site of Agonistic Democracy: Rethinking Pluralism Amid Cultural and Political Conflict

Marián Sekerák
Minerva
Academic Freedom and Politics
article

The University as a Site of Agonistic Democracy: Rethinking Pluralism Amid Cultural and Political Conflict

Marián Sekerák
article en

Abstract

This article reimagines the modern university as a site of agonistic democracy, a political space where disagreement and contestation are treated as essential conditions of democratic vitality rather than problems to be managed. Against the backdrop of intensifying culture wars, debates over academic freedom, and escalating protest politics, it critiques the liberal-deliberative model of the university, which often relies on neutrality, consensus, and procedural regulation to suppress dissent. Built on the agonistic conceptions of Mouffe and Connolly, the article develops a normative model of the “agonistic university,” showing how structured ideological conflict can be institutionalised to protect dissent, foster radical forms of democratic engagement, and channel ideological disputes constructively. This framework contributes to both democratic theory and higher education reform.

Minerva
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Academic Freedom and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The University as a Site of Agonistic Democracy: Rethinking Pluralism Amid Cultural and Political Conflict — Marián Sekerák · Minerva (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS