Climate-dependent yield–N2O trade-offs under drainage and nitrogen management: A modeling study in Southern Quebec

Controlled drainage (CD) can retain the operational benefits of subsurface drainage while reducing transport of nitrogen and phosphorus to surface water, yet its productivity–N 2 O trade-off remains poorly resolved. Here, we used the Root Zone Water Quality Model, calibrated and validated with long-term field data from southern Quebec, to evaluate how different degrees of drainage management and nitrogen (N) fertilization affect corn yield and soil N 2 O emissions under future climate projections. Drainage treatments included free drainage (FD; drain pipes installed approximately 1.0 m below the soil surface), CD with headgate settings of 75 and 55 cm below the soil surface (CD.75 and CD.55), and CD.55 combined with subirrigation (SI.55), together with four N rates (180–270 kg N ha –1 ). CD.75 represented moderate water-table elevation, whereas CD.55 and SI.55 were model-based management extensions representing greater water-table elevation. Historical simulations (1995–2014) and future simulations (2015–2054) under SSP126 and SSP585 were further evaluated across nine climate regimes defined by tertiles of growing-season precipitation (dry, normal, and wet) and mean daily maximum temperature (cool, mild, and hot). Projected growing-season conditions shifted from predominantly cool toward increasingly hot conditions, with hot–dry and hot–normal conditions becoming more frequent. Relative to FD, growing-season N 2 O emissions increased by 5.5–25.3%, depending on CD configuration and climate regime. Yield responses were similarly climate dependent: CD.55 and SI.55 increased yield by 3.2–10.4% under hot–dry conditions, whereas this benefit diminished as climate became wetter and cooler. In contrast, CD.75 maintained yields close to FD while incurring a smaller N 2 O penalty than CD.55 and SI.55 during wetter seasons. Accordingly, SI.55 and CD.55 performed most favorably under hot–dry conditions in terms of partial factor productivity of N (PFPN) and N 2 O intensity, whereas CD.75 resulted in relatively small PFPN losses and lower N 2 O risk across wetter seasons. Our simulations suggest that the productivity–N 2 O consequences of different CD configurations and N inputs depended on the dominant seasonal climate limitation, rather than indicating a universally optimal drainage–N combination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110828
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Climate-dependent yield–N2O trade-offs under drainage and nitrogen management: A modeling study in Southern Quebec

Harmanpreet Singh Grewal, Chandra A. Madramootoo, Chuanbin Liang, Jiancan Liu
Agricultural Water Management
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
article

Climate-dependent yield–N2O trade-offs under drainage and nitrogen management: A modeling study in Southern Quebec

Harmanpreet Singh Grewal, Chandra A. Madramootoo, Chuanbin Liang, Jiancan Liu
article en

Abstract

Controlled drainage (CD) can retain the operational benefits of subsurface drainage while reducing transport of nitrogen and phosphorus to surface water, yet its productivity–N 2 O trade-off remains poorly resolved. Here, we used the Root Zone Water Quality Model, calibrated and validated with long-term field data from southern Quebec, to evaluate how different degrees of drainage management and nitrogen (N) fertilization affect corn yield and soil N 2 O emissions under future climate projections. Drainage treatments included free drainage (FD; drain pipes installed approximately 1.0 m below the soil surface), CD with headgate settings of 75 and 55 cm below the soil surface (CD.75 and CD.55), and CD.55 combined with subirrigation (SI.55), together with four N rates (180–270 kg N ha –1 ). CD.75 represented moderate water-table elevation, whereas CD.55 and SI.55 were model-based management extensions representing greater water-table elevation. Historical simulations (1995–2014) and future simulations (2015–2054) under SSP126 and SSP585 were further evaluated across nine climate regimes defined by tertiles of growing-season precipitation (dry, normal, and wet) and mean daily maximum temperature (cool, mild, and hot). Projected growing-season conditions shifted from predominantly cool toward increasingly hot conditions, with hot–dry and hot–normal conditions becoming more frequent. Relative to FD, growing-season N 2 O emissions increased by 5.5–25.3%, depending on CD configuration and climate regime. Yield responses were similarly climate dependent: CD.55 and SI.55 increased yield by 3.2–10.4% under hot–dry conditions, whereas this benefit diminished as climate became wetter and cooler. In contrast, CD.75 maintained yields close to FD while incurring a smaller N 2 O penalty than CD.55 and SI.55 during wetter seasons. Accordingly, SI.55 and CD.55 performed most favorably under hot–dry conditions in terms of partial factor productivity of N (PFPN) and N 2 O intensity, whereas CD.75 resulted in relatively small PFPN losses and lower N 2 O risk across wetter seasons. Our simulations suggest that the productivity–N 2 O consequences of different CD configurations and N inputs depended on the dominant seasonal climate limitation, rather than indicating a universally optimal drainage–N combination.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 336
McGill University (CA), China Agricultural University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.