Delisting system reform effects on avoidance behavior and audit reporting: insights from China’s market

Purpose This study aims to investigate the effects of the latest delisting system reform, implemented in 2020 in China, on avoidance behaviors and audit disclosures among firms facing delisting risk. Design/methodology/approach The study uses the difference-in-differences model to empirically test panel data of China’s A-share-listed companies from 2018 to 2022, comparing observations before and after the reform. As a governance mechanism, changes in audit opinions are also analyzed. Findings The findings indicate that during the post-reform period analyzed, accrual-based earnings management increased while real earnings management remained stable. In addition, the likelihood of companies facing delisting risk receiving nonstandard audit opinions increased significantly, although there was no notable change in key audit matter disclosures. The results suggest that among the changes in the reform, although the cross-application of audit opinions and profit indicators is improving risk disclosure, further regulatory refinements are necessary to curtail delisting avoidance behavior. Originality/value The study provides systematic evidence on the reform’s aggregate impact, investigating its policy effects and focusing on common problems that require urgent solutions. The findings offer generalizable conclusions with significant implications for regulators assessing the policy’s overall effectiveness and for investors evaluating market-wide financial reporting quality to help enhance the capital market system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial Auditing Journal
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-11-2024-4587
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Delisting system reform effects on avoidance behavior and audit reporting: insights from China’s market

Dingrui Liu
Managerial Auditing Journal
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Delisting system reform effects on avoidance behavior and audit reporting: insights from China’s market

Dingrui Liu
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the effects of the latest delisting system reform, implemented in 2020 in China, on avoidance behaviors and audit disclosures among firms facing delisting risk. Design/methodology/approach The study uses the difference-in-differences model to empirically test panel data of China’s A-share-listed companies from 2018 to 2022, comparing observations before and after the reform. As a governance mechanism, changes in audit opinions are also analyzed. Findings The findings indicate that during the post-reform period analyzed, accrual-based earnings management increased while real earnings management remained stable. In addition, the likelihood of companies facing delisting risk receiving nonstandard audit opinions increased significantly, although there was no notable change in key audit matter disclosures. The results suggest that among the changes in the reform, although the cross-application of audit opinions and profit indicators is improving risk disclosure, further regulatory refinements are necessary to curtail delisting avoidance behavior. Originality/value The study provides systematic evidence on the reform’s aggregate impact, investigating its policy effects and focusing on common problems that require urgent solutions. The findings offer generalizable conclusions with significant implications for regulators assessing the policy’s overall effectiveness and for investors evaluating market-wide financial reporting quality to help enhance the capital market system.

Managerial Auditing Journal
Jilin University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.