Diagnostic yield of Humphrey visual field 30-2 testing for neurological versus non-neurological visual disorders: A tertiary-care retrospective study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of Humphrey visual field (HVF) 30-2 automated perimetry in differentiating neurological from non-neurological causes of visual dysfunction. METHODS: Design: Retrospective observational record-based study. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology at a tertiary-care referral institute in Central India. Study population: All HVF tests performed between July 2023 and June 2025 were reviewed. Of 1,438 tests performed, 383 reliable HVF tests using the 30-2 program with the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) Standard or SITA Fast strategy were included. Tests with fixation losses >20%, false positive or negative responses >15%, incomplete records, or media opacities were excluded. Observation procedure: Visual field tests were categorized according to indication as neurological or non-neurological causes. Field patterns were analyzed and correlated with clinical findings and neuroimaging results. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of HVF (30-2 program) contributing to confirmation of neurological disease. RESULTS: Among 383 HVF 30-2 tests, 226 (59.0%) were performed for neurological indications. Abnormal fields were detected in 132/226 (58.4%) neurological cases compared with 42/157 (26.8%) non-neurological cases (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR] 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.48-5.95). Confirmed neurological diseases were identified in 118 (52.2%) neurological referrals versus 3 (1.9%) non-neurological referrals (OR 56.6; 95% CI: 17.4-184.0). Bitemporal hemianopia (23.5%), homonymous hemianopia (19.7%), and central scotoma (16.7%) were the most common field patterns, with >90% radiological correlation. HVF 30-2 testing demonstrated high diagnostic performance for neurological disorders (OR 56.6; 95% CI: 17.4-184.0; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: HVF 30-2 perimetry demonstrates high diagnostic yield for neurological disorders and serves as a reliable, noninvasive functional investigation for neuro-ophthalmic evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_2767_25
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Diagnostic yield of Humphrey visual field 30-2 testing for neurological versus non-neurological visual disorders: A tertiary-care retrospective study

Vidhya Verma, Samendra Karkhur, Rama Tulasi Siri Duddumpudi, Saroj Gupta et al.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Diagnostic yield of Humphrey visual field 30-2 testing for neurological versus non-neurological visual disorders: A tertiary-care retrospective study

Vidhya Verma, Samendra Karkhur, Rama Tulasi Siri Duddumpudi, Saroj Gupta, Priti Singh
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of Humphrey visual field (HVF) 30-2 automated perimetry in differentiating neurological from non-neurological causes of visual dysfunction. METHODS: Design: Retrospective observational record-based study. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology at a tertiary-care referral institute in Central India. Study population: All HVF tests performed between July 2023 and June 2025 were reviewed. Of 1,438 tests performed, 383 reliable HVF tests using the 30-2 program with the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) Standard or SITA Fast strategy were included. Tests with fixation losses >20%, false positive or negative responses >15%, incomplete records, or media opacities were excluded. Observation procedure: Visual field tests were categorized according to indication as neurological or non-neurological causes. Field patterns were analyzed and correlated with clinical findings and neuroimaging results. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of HVF (30-2 program) contributing to confirmation of neurological disease. RESULTS: Among 383 HVF 30-2 tests, 226 (59.0%) were performed for neurological indications. Abnormal fields were detected in 132/226 (58.4%) neurological cases compared with 42/157 (26.8%) non-neurological cases (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR] 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.48-5.95). Confirmed neurological diseases were identified in 118 (52.2%) neurological referrals versus 3 (1.9%) non-neurological referrals (OR 56.6; 95% CI: 17.4-184.0). Bitemporal hemianopia (23.5%), homonymous hemianopia (19.7%), and central scotoma (16.7%) were the most common field patterns, with >90% radiological correlation. HVF 30-2 testing demonstrated high diagnostic performance for neurological disorders (OR 56.6; 95% CI: 17.4-184.0; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: HVF 30-2 perimetry demonstrates high diagnostic yield for neurological disorders and serves as a reliable, noninvasive functional investigation for neuro-ophthalmic evaluation.

Indian Journal of OphthalmologyVol. 74(10)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagnostic yield of Humphrey visual field 30-2 testing for neurological versus non-neurological visual disorders: A tertiary-care retrospective study — Vidhya Verma, Samendra Karkhur, et al. · Indian Journal of Ophthalmology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS