A comprehensive review of materials and process parameters in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM): Current insights and future directions

Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) has emerged as a transformative metal additive manufacturing technology, capable of fabricating large-scale, geometrically complex metallic components at high deposition rates and relatively low cost. This article presents a systematic and critical review of recent WAAM research, covering five principal material systems, alloy steels, stainless steels, aluminum alloys, titanium alloys, and nickel-based superalloys, alongside a comparative analysis of key process variants including Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW), Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW), Plasma Arc Welding (PAW), Cold Metal Transfer (CMT), and hybrid Laser Metal Deposition (LMD) systems. The review critically examines the influence of process parameters, particularly heat input, wire feed rate, travel speed, and interpass temperature, on microstructural evolution, defect formation, and mechanical anisotropy. Post-processing strategies, including interpass cooling, cold rolling, and heat treatment, are evaluated with respect to their effectiveness in mitigating anisotropy, reducing residual stress, and enhancing tensile and fatigue performance. A comparative analysis identifies persistent cross-material challenges, including columnar grain dominance, porosity, and directional mechanical properties, alongside targeted mitigation strategies. The review further identifies critical knowledge gaps in intelligent process monitoring through digital twin frameworks and machine learning, the processing of emerging alloy systems such as high-entropy alloys (HEAs) and functionally graded materials (FGMs), and the standardization of qualification protocols required for industrial certification. By synthesizing findings from over 100 recent publications, this review provides a structured research agenda to accelerate the transition of WAAM from laboratory demonstrations to full-scale industrial deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Materials
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.103676
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A comprehensive review of materials and process parameters in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM): Current insights and future directions

Hammar Ilham Akbar, Bambang Kusharjanta, Rauuf Nur Fattah, Triyono
Next Materials
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

A comprehensive review of materials and process parameters in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM): Current insights and future directions

Hammar Ilham Akbar, Bambang Kusharjanta, Rauuf Nur Fattah, Triyono
article en

Abstract

Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) has emerged as a transformative metal additive manufacturing technology, capable of fabricating large-scale, geometrically complex metallic components at high deposition rates and relatively low cost. This article presents a systematic and critical review of recent WAAM research, covering five principal material systems, alloy steels, stainless steels, aluminum alloys, titanium alloys, and nickel-based superalloys, alongside a comparative analysis of key process variants including Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW), Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW), Plasma Arc Welding (PAW), Cold Metal Transfer (CMT), and hybrid Laser Metal Deposition (LMD) systems. The review critically examines the influence of process parameters, particularly heat input, wire feed rate, travel speed, and interpass temperature, on microstructural evolution, defect formation, and mechanical anisotropy. Post-processing strategies, including interpass cooling, cold rolling, and heat treatment, are evaluated with respect to their effectiveness in mitigating anisotropy, reducing residual stress, and enhancing tensile and fatigue performance. A comparative analysis identifies persistent cross-material challenges, including columnar grain dominance, porosity, and directional mechanical properties, alongside targeted mitigation strategies. The review further identifies critical knowledge gaps in intelligent process monitoring through digital twin frameworks and machine learning, the processing of emerging alloy systems such as high-entropy alloys (HEAs) and functionally graded materials (FGMs), and the standardization of qualification protocols required for industrial certification. By synthesizing findings from over 100 recent publications, this review provides a structured research agenda to accelerate the transition of WAAM from laboratory demonstrations to full-scale industrial deployment.

Next MaterialsVol. 13
Sebelas Maret University (ID)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comprehensive review of materials and process parameters in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM): Current insights and future directions — Hammar Ilham Akbar, Bambang Kusharjanta, et al. · Next Materials (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS