PS12-14. Evaluation of Infrared Thermography to Assess Body Temperature in Beef Heifers of Different Breeds and Residual Feed Intake Phenotypes During Winter.

Abstract This study evaluated infrared thermography to assess body temperature in beef heifers with divergent residual feed intake (RFI) during winter. Ninety-eight beef heifers (Angus [AN], Charolais [CH], Kinsella Composite [KC], and Hays Converter [HC]; 235 ± 18.1, 225 ± 18.2, 246 ± 19.5, and 228 ± 17.5 kg body weight, respectively; 8 ± 1 mo of age) were managed in a drylot for 86 d, and fat-corrected RFI was calculated. Heifers were classified as more (LOW-RFI = −0.43 ± 0.308, −0.36 ± 0.307, −0.48 ± 0.386, and −0.54 ± 0.356 kg DM/d; n = 13, 15, 14, and 12 for AN, CH, KC, and HC, respectively) or less efficient (HIGH-RFI = 0.43 ± 0.254, 0.67 ± 0.218, 0.56 ± 0.385, and 0.59 ± 0.348 kg DM/d; n = 13, 8, 12, and 11, respectively). Weather was recorded daily, and infrared images of the frontal bone, eye, nasal bone, snout, cheek, flank, and ventral tail were collected every 17 ± 6 d using FLIR E8 PRO and analyzed using a linear mixed model with RFI, day, and interaction as fixed effects and animal as a random effect (SAS 9.4). Mean air temperature was -23, -11, -12, 3, -27, and 6 °C on d 0, 16, 30, 44, 58, and 85, respectively. Eye temperatures were greater in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI KC but lower in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI CH (P < 0.01). Snout temperatures were lower in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI KC (P = 0.009), but greater in nasal bone in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI AN (P = 0.03). Tendencies indicated lower snout, ventral tail, and nasal bone temperatures in LOW-RFI AN and CH vs. HIGH-RFI (P < 0.09). Day affected all body regions across breeds (P < 0.01). RFI × day interactions indicated that thermal responses varied with environmental conditions: a higher cheek temperature was found in HIGH-RFI AN at warmest sampling but was lower at coldest (P = 0.02); flank temperature was higher in LOW-RFI than HIGH-RFI CH at − 23 °C (P = 0.03), and eye temperature was higher in LOW-RFI than HIGH-RFI KC at − 12 and −27 °C (P < 0.001). Frontal bone temperature was higher in LOW- vs HIGH-RFI KC at 3 and 6 °C (P = 0.02), while nasal bone increased with warmer air (6 vs. -27 °C) in LOW-RFI HC (P < 0.001). A tendency for a RFI × day interaction was observed in HC for frontal bone and cheek, with higher temperatures in LOW- than HIGH-RFI at 3 and −12 °C (P < 0.09). Infrared thermography detected RFI-related temperature differences across breeds and winter conditions. However, thermal responses varied by region and breed, limiting standalone reliability. Thermography may support feed efficiency classification but requires further validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.439
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

PS12-14. Evaluation of Infrared Thermography to Assess Body Temperature in Beef Heifers of Different Breeds and Residual Feed Intake Phenotypes During Winter.

Weiguang Hao, Carolyn Fitzsimmons, Gleise Medeiros da Silva, Arturo Macias Franco et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

PS12-14. Evaluation of Infrared Thermography to Assess Body Temperature in Beef Heifers of Different Breeds and Residual Feed Intake Phenotypes During Winter.

Weiguang Hao, Carolyn Fitzsimmons, Gleise Medeiros da Silva, Arturo Macias Franco, Londono-Mendez Camila Maria Camila, Sergio Lasso Ramirez
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated infrared thermography to assess body temperature in beef heifers with divergent residual feed intake (RFI) during winter. Ninety-eight beef heifers (Angus [AN], Charolais [CH], Kinsella Composite [KC], and Hays Converter [HC]; 235 ± 18.1, 225 ± 18.2, 246 ± 19.5, and 228 ± 17.5 kg body weight, respectively; 8 ± 1 mo of age) were managed in a drylot for 86 d, and fat-corrected RFI was calculated. Heifers were classified as more (LOW-RFI = −0.43 ± 0.308, −0.36 ± 0.307, −0.48 ± 0.386, and −0.54 ± 0.356 kg DM/d; n = 13, 15, 14, and 12 for AN, CH, KC, and HC, respectively) or less efficient (HIGH-RFI = 0.43 ± 0.254, 0.67 ± 0.218, 0.56 ± 0.385, and 0.59 ± 0.348 kg DM/d; n = 13, 8, 12, and 11, respectively). Weather was recorded daily, and infrared images of the frontal bone, eye, nasal bone, snout, cheek, flank, and ventral tail were collected every 17 ± 6 d using FLIR E8 PRO and analyzed using a linear mixed model with RFI, day, and interaction as fixed effects and animal as a random effect (SAS 9.4). Mean air temperature was -23, -11, -12, 3, -27, and 6 °C on d 0, 16, 30, 44, 58, and 85, respectively. Eye temperatures were greater in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI KC but lower in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI CH (P < 0.01). Snout temperatures were lower in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI KC (P = 0.009), but greater in nasal bone in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI AN (P = 0.03). Tendencies indicated lower snout, ventral tail, and nasal bone temperatures in LOW-RFI AN and CH vs. HIGH-RFI (P < 0.09). Day affected all body regions across breeds (P < 0.01). RFI × day interactions indicated that thermal responses varied with environmental conditions: a higher cheek temperature was found in HIGH-RFI AN at warmest sampling but was lower at coldest (P = 0.02); flank temperature was higher in LOW-RFI than HIGH-RFI CH at − 23 °C (P = 0.03), and eye temperature was higher in LOW-RFI than HIGH-RFI KC at − 12 and −27 °C (P < 0.001). Frontal bone temperature was higher in LOW- vs HIGH-RFI KC at 3 and 6 °C (P = 0.02), while nasal bone increased with warmer air (6 vs. -27 °C) in LOW-RFI HC (P < 0.001). A tendency for a RFI × day interaction was observed in HC for frontal bone and cheek, with higher temperatures in LOW- than HIGH-RFI at 3 and −12 °C (P < 0.09). Infrared thermography detected RFI-related temperature differences across breeds and winter conditions. However, thermal responses varied by region and breed, limiting standalone reliability. Thermography may support feed efficiency classification but requires further validation.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_5)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.