From COVID-19-Associated Acute Kidney Injury to Long-Term Kidney Dysfunction: Recovery Phenotypes, Risk Stratification, and Post-COVID Renal Surveillance

Background: COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in severe disease, but its long-term kidney implications are heterogeneous and incompletely defined. Objective: To synthesize recovery phenotypes and longitudinal outcomes, reconcile conflicting evidence on whether COVID-associated AKI differs from other-cause AKI, and set out implications for surveillance and management. Methods: The evidence base was assembled through a targeted PubMed/MEDLINE search for COVID-19 and kidney dysfunction (January 2020 to August 2026), hand-searching of reference lists, and direct retrieval of pivotal longitudinal cohorts and clinical practice guidelines. Longitudinal cohorts and comparative studies were prioritized. Findings: AKI severity, duration, kidney replacement therapy, lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and incomplete early recovery consistently identify patients at greatest risk. Longitudinal studies disagree on whether COVID-AKI confers more risk than AKI from other illnesses: early cohorts reported steeper eGFR loss, whereas a later 9624-patient cohort found lower adjusted major adverse kidney events. This divergence reflects differences in kidney reference point, outcome construction, ascertainment, and handling of competing death rather than genuine contradiction. Population studies show long-term kidney failure is concentrated after hospitalization and severe disease. Candidate biomarkers remain investigational. Conclusions: Post-COVID kidney risk is severity- and phenotype-dependent rather than universal. Follow-up is most defensible after hospitalized AKI, incomplete recovery, advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis, or transplantation and applies existing post-AKI guidance rather than a COVID-specific schedule. Survivors who meet Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for CKD at three months, namely a GFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or a persistent marker of kidney damage, become eligible for guideline-directed therapy, though no trial has enrolled on recent AKI. Prospective studies should test whether structured follow-up improves outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pathogens
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15101022
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From COVID-19-Associated Acute Kidney Injury to Long-Term Kidney Dysfunction: Recovery Phenotypes, Risk Stratification, and Post-COVID Renal Surveillance

Yahia A. Mjery, Mohammed Abdulrasak, Mostafa Mohrag, Faisal Madkhali
Pathogens
Acute Kidney Injury Research
article

From COVID-19-Associated Acute Kidney Injury to Long-Term Kidney Dysfunction: Recovery Phenotypes, Risk Stratification, and Post-COVID Renal Surveillance

Yahia A. Mjery, Mohammed Abdulrasak, Mostafa Mohrag, Faisal Madkhali
article en

Abstract

Background: COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in severe disease, but its long-term kidney implications are heterogeneous and incompletely defined. Objective: To synthesize recovery phenotypes and longitudinal outcomes, reconcile conflicting evidence on whether COVID-associated AKI differs from other-cause AKI, and set out implications for surveillance and management. Methods: The evidence base was assembled through a targeted PubMed/MEDLINE search for COVID-19 and kidney dysfunction (January 2020 to August 2026), hand-searching of reference lists, and direct retrieval of pivotal longitudinal cohorts and clinical practice guidelines. Longitudinal cohorts and comparative studies were prioritized. Findings: AKI severity, duration, kidney replacement therapy, lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and incomplete early recovery consistently identify patients at greatest risk. Longitudinal studies disagree on whether COVID-AKI confers more risk than AKI from other illnesses: early cohorts reported steeper eGFR loss, whereas a later 9624-patient cohort found lower adjusted major adverse kidney events. This divergence reflects differences in kidney reference point, outcome construction, ascertainment, and handling of competing death rather than genuine contradiction. Population studies show long-term kidney failure is concentrated after hospitalization and severe disease. Candidate biomarkers remain investigational. Conclusions: Post-COVID kidney risk is severity- and phenotype-dependent rather than universal. Follow-up is most defensible after hospitalized AKI, incomplete recovery, advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis, or transplantation and applies existing post-AKI guidance rather than a COVID-specific schedule. Survivors who meet Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for CKD at three months, namely a GFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or a persistent marker of kidney damage, become eligible for guideline-directed therapy, though no trial has enrolled on recent AKI. Prospective studies should test whether structured follow-up improves outcomes.

PathogensVol. 15(10)
Lund University (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Jazan University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.