Standardization in Healthcare Environments: A Scoping Review

Background Healthcare systems are complex environments, and standardization is often viewed as a strategy to streamline complexity, reduce variability, improve patient safety, and enhance operational efficiency. While standardization has proven effective in industries such as aviation, nuclear plants, and manufacturing, its applicability in healthcare for its intended outcomes remains fundamentally contested . Additionally, current literature lacks a consistent definition or taxonomy of standardization in healthcare facility design. This creates conceptual ambiguity in both research and practice. Objective The aim of the scoping review is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the role of standardization in the healthcare-built environment, specifically focusing on inpatient settings, by examining how it has been studied and applied across healthcare settings. Method This review systematically searched peer-reviewed literature using the PRISMA-Scr structured framework to identify studies examining standardization in the healthcare-built environment. The review examined five databases using the Population, Concept, and Context framework, which guided keyword selection. Results The review included 28 articles and analyzed the aspects of standardization that have been studied, the rationale for its application, the implementation approach, and reported positive and negative outcomes across inpatient settings. Conclusions The findings suggest that the approach of standardization remains theoretical and conceptual, with very few studies empirically evaluating its outcomes. The existing literature suggests that standardization can reduce cognitive workload, improve workflow efficiency, and enhance safety when aligned with clinical processes and organizational culture. However, its implementation is challenged by the complexity and variability of healthcare delivery practices, resistance related to clinical autonomy, and limited integration across systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867261485589
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Standardization in Healthcare Environments: A Scoping Review

Dina Battisto, Ashita Arora
HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

Standardization in Healthcare Environments: A Scoping Review

Dina Battisto, Ashita Arora
article en

Abstract

Background Healthcare systems are complex environments, and standardization is often viewed as a strategy to streamline complexity, reduce variability, improve patient safety, and enhance operational efficiency. While standardization has proven effective in industries such as aviation, nuclear plants, and manufacturing, its applicability in healthcare for its intended outcomes remains fundamentally contested . Additionally, current literature lacks a consistent definition or taxonomy of standardization in healthcare facility design. This creates conceptual ambiguity in both research and practice. Objective The aim of the scoping review is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the role of standardization in the healthcare-built environment, specifically focusing on inpatient settings, by examining how it has been studied and applied across healthcare settings. Method This review systematically searched peer-reviewed literature using the PRISMA-Scr structured framework to identify studies examining standardization in the healthcare-built environment. The review examined five databases using the Population, Concept, and Context framework, which guided keyword selection. Results The review included 28 articles and analyzed the aspects of standardization that have been studied, the rationale for its application, the implementation approach, and reported positive and negative outcomes across inpatient settings. Conclusions The findings suggest that the approach of standardization remains theoretical and conceptual, with very few studies empirically evaluating its outcomes. The existing literature suggests that standardization can reduce cognitive workload, improve workflow efficiency, and enhance safety when aligned with clinical processes and organizational culture. However, its implementation is challenged by the complexity and variability of healthcare delivery practices, resistance related to clinical autonomy, and limited integration across systems.

HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Clemson University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Standardization in Healthcare Environments: A Scoping Review — Dina Battisto, Ashita Arora · HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS