Requisitioned academic time: A contradictory deconstruction of Chinese university faculty’s work priorities under the “Double First-Class” initiative

This study examines the academic career development context in China through a temporal lens. Based on questionnaire data collected from university faculty across 12 Chinese provinces and municipalities, the analysis reveals three core findings. First, undergraduate teaching constitutes a compulsory and high-priority time block for Chinese university academics. Second, while most faculty aspire to prioritize academic writing, administrative tasks consistently take precedence over research in practice—a pattern rooted in the dominance of administrative power over academic authority in higher education institutions. Third, faculty’s expected priority for research time significantly outweighs its actual operational priority in daily work. Accordingly, this study proposes a tri-level governance framework to support the sustainable development of China’s academic profession.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356772
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Requisitioned academic time: A contradictory deconstruction of Chinese university faculty’s work priorities under the “Double First-Class” initiative

Mengyun Fu, Jiajin Wu
PLoS ONE
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Requisitioned academic time: A contradictory deconstruction of Chinese university faculty’s work priorities under the “Double First-Class” initiative

Mengyun Fu, Jiajin Wu
article en

Abstract

This study examines the academic career development context in China through a temporal lens. Based on questionnaire data collected from university faculty across 12 Chinese provinces and municipalities, the analysis reveals three core findings. First, undergraduate teaching constitutes a compulsory and high-priority time block for Chinese university academics. Second, while most faculty aspire to prioritize academic writing, administrative tasks consistently take precedence over research in practice—a pattern rooted in the dominance of administrative power over academic authority in higher education institutions. Third, faculty’s expected priority for research time significantly outweighs its actual operational priority in daily work. Accordingly, this study proposes a tri-level governance framework to support the sustainable development of China’s academic profession.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Huaqiao University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.