ACCURACY OF TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR 5 EPIDURAL INJECTION BY ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE CONFIRMED BY FLUOROSCOPE AND DYE INJECTION

Background: Transforaminal epidural injection of lumbar vertebrae 5 is the agreeable procedure for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. The process is under Fluoroscopic guidance to ensure delicate needle positioning and to exclude intravascular injection but the negative point was exposure to radiation and the need to wear heavy lead apron. Ultrasound technique is considered to be low risk intervention and help to identify soft tissue target without radiation so the US guidance is thought to be an attractive alternative to fluoroscopy. Aim: The aim of study was to determine the accuracy of needle tip under ultrasound guidance thereafter confirmed with fluoroscopy in patient who is subjected to transforaminal nerve root injection. Patient and Method: A total of 20 patients with lumbar vertebrae 5 disc prolapse and radiculopathy referring to department of pain whose diagnosis were previously confirmed by Magnetic resonance imaging and were selected to undergo lumbar transforaminal epidural injection. The ultrasound guidance was used to perform transforaminal epidural injection. A needle was placed under the guidance of ultrasound and then confirmed with fluoroscope for dye spread. Results: The successful rate of ultrasound guided interventions was 95%(19) of 20 patient as confirmed by fluoroscopy and there was only one failed case in the ultrasound guided. There was significant association between ultrasound approach success and the fluoroscopy and there was significant positive correlation between ultrasound approach trials and number of fluoroscopy images. Ultrasound trials were significantly higher in failed ultrasound approach and in patients weighed 60-79kg. The number of images required in ultrasound approach was significantly lower than the number of images required in fluoroscopy approach. Conclusion: Ultrasound guided lumber transforaminal epidural injections are accurate and practical in clinical cases with successful rate of 95%, ultrasound guidance has decreased radiation exposure and decreased need of operative room to significant level in this study.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23034640
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

ACCURACY OF TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR 5 EPIDURAL INJECTION BY ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE CONFIRMED BY FLUOROSCOPE AND DYE INJECTION

Dr. Aya Raad Salman Abu Altemen*1, Prof. Iyad Abbas Salman2, Dr. Hala Baqir Kadum Al-Saedi3
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

ACCURACY OF TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR 5 EPIDURAL INJECTION BY ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE CONFIRMED BY FLUOROSCOPE AND DYE INJECTION

Dr. Aya Raad Salman Abu Altemen*1, Prof. Iyad Abbas Salman2, Dr. Hala Baqir Kadum Al-Saedi3
article en

Abstract

Background: Transforaminal epidural injection of lumbar vertebrae 5 is the agreeable procedure for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. The process is under Fluoroscopic guidance to ensure delicate needle positioning and to exclude intravascular injection but the negative point was exposure to radiation and the need to wear heavy lead apron. Ultrasound technique is considered to be low risk intervention and help to identify soft tissue target without radiation so the US guidance is thought to be an attractive alternative to fluoroscopy. Aim: The aim of study was to determine the accuracy of needle tip under ultrasound guidance thereafter confirmed with fluoroscopy in patient who is subjected to transforaminal nerve root injection. Patient and Method: A total of 20 patients with lumbar vertebrae 5 disc prolapse and radiculopathy referring to department of pain whose diagnosis were previously confirmed by Magnetic resonance imaging and were selected to undergo lumbar transforaminal epidural injection. The ultrasound guidance was used to perform transforaminal epidural injection. A needle was placed under the guidance of ultrasound and then confirmed with fluoroscope for dye spread. Results: The successful rate of ultrasound guided interventions was 95%(19) of 20 patient as confirmed by fluoroscopy and there was only one failed case in the ultrasound guided. There was significant association between ultrasound approach success and the fluoroscopy and there was significant positive correlation between ultrasound approach trials and number of fluoroscopy images. Ultrasound trials were significantly higher in failed ultrasound approach and in patients weighed 60-79kg. The number of images required in ultrasound approach was significantly lower than the number of images required in fluoroscopy approach. Conclusion: Ultrasound guided lumber transforaminal epidural injections are accurate and practical in clinical cases with successful rate of 95%, ultrasound guidance has decreased radiation exposure and decreased need of operative room to significant level in this study.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ACCURACY OF TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR 5 EPIDURAL INJECTION BY ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE CONFIRMED BY FLUOROSCOPE AND DYE INJECTION — Dr. Aya Raad Salman Abu Altemen*1, Prof. Iyad Abbas Salman2, Dr. Hala Baqir Kadum Al-Saedi3 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS