Investigation of Individual Differences in Single-Word Spelling Skill in Adult Speakers of Mandarin: An Orthographic Processing Explanation

The examination of individual differences in spelling ability in adults is potentially theoretically informative but has attracted little research attention. Most of this work has involved speakers of English, and some indicated that orthographic processing may be an important factor that distinguishes better from poorer spellers. The current investigations were carried out in Mandarin, which has a logographic writing system. Because Chinese characters place particularly heavy demands on visual–orthographic processing, adult Mandarin spelling provides a strong test case for orthographic accounts of individual differences in spelling ability. Participants were 54 adult speakers of Mandarin. We used adaptations of the tasks that have previously been used in studies of spelling with English speakers, including assessments of phonological processing, visual memory, character report and reading fluency. We used hierarchical multiple regression to examine the unique contribution of these literacy-related variables to spelling accuracy after controlling for chronological age and single-character identification. We also conducted quantitative error analysis of the participants’ spelling errors, using error categories that distinguish phonologically appropriate errors and orthographic errors. Finally, we conducted item-level logistic regression analyses to examine the influence of number of logographemes per character on spelling accuracy at the individual-participant level. The results of the hierarchical regression analyses examining the influence of the literacy-related variables showed that character report was the strongest predictor of spelling accuracy. Quantitative error analysis of the participants’ spelling errors revealed that the rate of orthographic errors increased with a decrease in spelling accuracy, while the rate of phonological errors (homophone and semi-homophone substitutions) reduced. Item-based analyses based on individual-level logistic regression analyses showed that participants with lower spelling accuracy were more sensitive to the number of logographemes per character. The results are in line with those found in previous studies in English, indicating the importance of orthographic processes in determining spelling ability in adults. We discuss the findings in the light of theories that include orthographic working memory as a late stage in the process of single-word spelling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cognitive Sciences
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijcs2040021
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Investigation of Individual Differences in Single-Word Spelling Skill in Adult Speakers of Mandarin: An Orthographic Processing Explanation

Jackie Masterson, Tianyi Wang
International Journal of Cognitive Sciences
Digital Communication and Language
article

Investigation of Individual Differences in Single-Word Spelling Skill in Adult Speakers of Mandarin: An Orthographic Processing Explanation

Jackie Masterson, Tianyi Wang
article en

Abstract

The examination of individual differences in spelling ability in adults is potentially theoretically informative but has attracted little research attention. Most of this work has involved speakers of English, and some indicated that orthographic processing may be an important factor that distinguishes better from poorer spellers. The current investigations were carried out in Mandarin, which has a logographic writing system. Because Chinese characters place particularly heavy demands on visual–orthographic processing, adult Mandarin spelling provides a strong test case for orthographic accounts of individual differences in spelling ability. Participants were 54 adult speakers of Mandarin. We used adaptations of the tasks that have previously been used in studies of spelling with English speakers, including assessments of phonological processing, visual memory, character report and reading fluency. We used hierarchical multiple regression to examine the unique contribution of these literacy-related variables to spelling accuracy after controlling for chronological age and single-character identification. We also conducted quantitative error analysis of the participants’ spelling errors, using error categories that distinguish phonologically appropriate errors and orthographic errors. Finally, we conducted item-level logistic regression analyses to examine the influence of number of logographemes per character on spelling accuracy at the individual-participant level. The results of the hierarchical regression analyses examining the influence of the literacy-related variables showed that character report was the strongest predictor of spelling accuracy. Quantitative error analysis of the participants’ spelling errors revealed that the rate of orthographic errors increased with a decrease in spelling accuracy, while the rate of phonological errors (homophone and semi-homophone substitutions) reduced. Item-based analyses based on individual-level logistic regression analyses showed that participants with lower spelling accuracy were more sensitive to the number of logographemes per character. The results are in line with those found in previous studies in English, indicating the importance of orthographic processes in determining spelling ability in adults. We discuss the findings in the light of theories that include orthographic working memory as a late stage in the process of single-word spelling.

International Journal of Cognitive SciencesVol. 2(4)
University College London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.