Comparative evaluation of viability assays and functional analysis of bbi29 in Borrelia burgdorferi

ABSTRACT In vitro viability assays are essential for studying the survival of Borrelia burgdorferi after exposure to stressful conditions. In contrast to the cumbersome and tedious manual microscopic counting method, fluorescence-based assays are more rapid and convenient and thus can be used in a high-throughput format. In the SYBR Green I/propidium iodide (PI) assay, spirochetes are labeled with different fluorescent dyes, and fluorescence ratios are then compared to calculate the ratio between live and dead spirochetes. Stained spirochetes are also manually counted under a fluorescence microscope or analyzed via flow cytometry to obtain the live/dead ratio. In this study, we compared these methods to determine the most accurate technique for quantifying spirochete viability. Our results showed that, compared with the SYBR Green I/PI assay that carries inherent caveats, both the fluorescent microscopic counting method and the flow cytometry method provide more reliable and accurate results for B. burgdorferi viability assays, and flow cytometry offers significant advantages in speed and reduced labor compared to manual microscopic counting. Leveraging the flow cytometry-based viability assay, we investigated the role of gene bbi29 , encoding a putative virulence-associated lipoprotein, in B. burgdorferi stress response. The contribution of bbi29 to B. burgdorferi mammalian infection was also examined using a murine model of Lyme disease. IMPORTANCE Lyme disease, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi , is the most common tick-borne disease in the United States. Assessment of B. burgdorferi growth and viability has been traditionally challenging due to the slow growth and unique morphology of the spirochete. Recently, an optimized SYBR Green I/PI assay was developed and has since been used by a number of laboratories to assess B. burgdorferi viability. We herein surprisingly found that the SYBR Green I/PI assay has significant caveats and does not provide accurate quantification of B. burgdorferi viability. Rather, our data showed that flow cytometry is a superior alternative to quantify spirochete viability, providing a valuable methodological framework for future studies. Additionally, by investigating the role and requirement for gene bbi29 , we have refined our understanding of hypothetical proteins in B. burgdorferi pathogenesis. Together, this work highlights the importance of developing and validating experimental approaches and functionally characterizing B. burgdorferi genes with unknown functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01574-26
Primary Topic
Vector-borne infectious diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative evaluation of viability assays and functional analysis of bbi29 in Borrelia burgdorferi

Zhiming Ouyang, Sierra George, Connor Waldron
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Vector-borne infectious diseases
article

Comparative evaluation of viability assays and functional analysis of bbi29 in Borrelia burgdorferi

Zhiming Ouyang, Sierra George, Connor Waldron
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In vitro viability assays are essential for studying the survival of Borrelia burgdorferi after exposure to stressful conditions. In contrast to the cumbersome and tedious manual microscopic counting method, fluorescence-based assays are more rapid and convenient and thus can be used in a high-throughput format. In the SYBR Green I/propidium iodide (PI) assay, spirochetes are labeled with different fluorescent dyes, and fluorescence ratios are then compared to calculate the ratio between live and dead spirochetes. Stained spirochetes are also manually counted under a fluorescence microscope or analyzed via flow cytometry to obtain the live/dead ratio. In this study, we compared these methods to determine the most accurate technique for quantifying spirochete viability. Our results showed that, compared with the SYBR Green I/PI assay that carries inherent caveats, both the fluorescent microscopic counting method and the flow cytometry method provide more reliable and accurate results for B. burgdorferi viability assays, and flow cytometry offers significant advantages in speed and reduced labor compared to manual microscopic counting. Leveraging the flow cytometry-based viability assay, we investigated the role of gene bbi29 , encoding a putative virulence-associated lipoprotein, in B. burgdorferi stress response. The contribution of bbi29 to B. burgdorferi mammalian infection was also examined using a murine model of Lyme disease. IMPORTANCE Lyme disease, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi , is the most common tick-borne disease in the United States. Assessment of B. burgdorferi growth and viability has been traditionally challenging due to the slow growth and unique morphology of the spirochete. Recently, an optimized SYBR Green I/PI assay was developed and has since been used by a number of laboratories to assess B. burgdorferi viability. We herein surprisingly found that the SYBR Green I/PI assay has significant caveats and does not provide accurate quantification of B. burgdorferi viability. Rather, our data showed that flow cytometry is a superior alternative to quantify spirochete viability, providing a valuable methodological framework for future studies. Additionally, by investigating the role and requirement for gene bbi29 , we have refined our understanding of hypothetical proteins in B. burgdorferi pathogenesis. Together, this work highlights the importance of developing and validating experimental approaches and functionally characterizing B. burgdorferi genes with unknown functions.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology
University of South Florida (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Vector-borne infectious diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.