Assessing internal noise levels in powered air purifying respirators using standardized manikin sizes in a laboratory setting

Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) generate internal noise from the blower and result in turbulent airflow. Internal noise may reduce speech clarity and increase listening effort during critical tasks. This study examined how PAPR brand and user configuration factors affected internal noise levels. A total of 1,200 internal PAPR noise measurements were recorded on a manikin across multiple experimental conditions: two PAPR brands, five manikin sizes, hair or shroud attached (Yes/No), and both hair and shroud attached. The generalized linear mixed model with a rank-based nonparametric test was used to analyze the bivariate association between variables, given the abnormal distribution of the mean noise data. The use of the active 3M PAPR on a small manikin produced the highest mean noise level [70.7 dBA; 95% confidence interval (CI): 70.31 to 71.16] at baseline (i.e., without hair or shroud), while use on a medium manikin had the lowest (57.3 dBA; CI: 56.87 to 57.72). The 3M PAPR was significantly louder (Mean difference: 4.1 dBA; CI: 3.44 to 4.72) than the MAXAIR at baseline, though after adjusting for PAPR brand and manikin size, and considering hair and shroud individually, MAXAIR was slightly but significantly louder (Mean difference: 0.5 dBA; CI: 0.20 to 0. 90). The presence of hair was associated with a significant reduction (Mean reduction: 2.31 dBA; CI: 0. 98 to 3.65) in internal noise levels after adjusting for PAPR brand and manikin. Use of a shroud alone had a small, nonsignificant effect (Mean difference: 0.78 dBA; CI: −0.55 to 2.11) on noise levels. However, the combined effect of hair and a shroud, when comparing “Both vs. None,” resulted in a lower noise level (Mean difference: 3.08 dBA; CI: −0.01 to 6.17), although this reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.101). These findings suggest the need to focus on blower and airflow design, along with considering acoustic dampening near the ears, to improve communication during use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2026.2722301
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessing internal noise levels in powered air purifying respirators using standardized manikin sizes in a laboratory setting

Cheryl L. Beseler, Brian Maass, Ikenna Orji, Matthew Nonnenmann et al.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

Assessing internal noise levels in powered air purifying respirators using standardized manikin sizes in a laboratory setting

Cheryl L. Beseler, Brian Maass, Ikenna Orji, Matthew Nonnenmann, John Lowe
article en

Abstract

Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) generate internal noise from the blower and result in turbulent airflow. Internal noise may reduce speech clarity and increase listening effort during critical tasks. This study examined how PAPR brand and user configuration factors affected internal noise levels. A total of 1,200 internal PAPR noise measurements were recorded on a manikin across multiple experimental conditions: two PAPR brands, five manikin sizes, hair or shroud attached (Yes/No), and both hair and shroud attached. The generalized linear mixed model with a rank-based nonparametric test was used to analyze the bivariate association between variables, given the abnormal distribution of the mean noise data. The use of the active 3M PAPR on a small manikin produced the highest mean noise level [70.7 dBA; 95% confidence interval (CI): 70.31 to 71.16] at baseline (i.e., without hair or shroud), while use on a medium manikin had the lowest (57.3 dBA; CI: 56.87 to 57.72). The 3M PAPR was significantly louder (Mean difference: 4.1 dBA; CI: 3.44 to 4.72) than the MAXAIR at baseline, though after adjusting for PAPR brand and manikin size, and considering hair and shroud individually, MAXAIR was slightly but significantly louder (Mean difference: 0.5 dBA; CI: 0.20 to 0. 90). The presence of hair was associated with a significant reduction (Mean reduction: 2.31 dBA; CI: 0. 98 to 3.65) in internal noise levels after adjusting for PAPR brand and manikin. Use of a shroud alone had a small, nonsignificant effect (Mean difference: 0.78 dBA; CI: −0.55 to 2.11) on noise levels. However, the combined effect of hair and a shroud, when comparing “Both vs. None,” resulted in a lower noise level (Mean difference: 3.08 dBA; CI: −0.01 to 6.17), although this reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.101). These findings suggest the need to focus on blower and airflow design, along with considering acoustic dampening near the ears, to improve communication during use.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.