From PFOS to a Sum of 25 PFASs: Regulatory and Effect-Based Risk Assessment in the River Ruhr

Regulatory assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in European surface waters is shifting from a single-compound environmental quality standard (EQS) for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) toward a potency-weighted sum of 25 PFASs criterion under the revised Water Framework Directive (WFD). This environmental survey investigated how this regulatory change affects screening-level assessment of PFAS contamination and whether chemical classifications are consistent with an effect-based endpoint. Fourteen surface-water samples from the river Ruhr and its tributary, the Möhne (Germany), were enriched by weak anion-exchange solid-phase extraction and analyzed by targeted liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, combustion ion chromatography for extractable organic fluorine (EOF), and the TTR–TRβ chemical activated luciferase gene expression bioassay (referred to as PFAS CALUX). Thirteen PFAS were quantified. At every location with valid target-PFAS data except site A, both the former PFOS annual average EQS of 0.65 ng L−1 and the revised water-column criterion of 4.4 ng PFOA-equivalents L−1 for the sum of 25 PFASs were exceeded when the latter was calculated from the WFD-listed PFASs covered by the analytical method. Because trifluoroacetic acid and perfluor (((5-methoxy-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)oxy)acetic acid) were not measured, this represents a lower-bound estimate of the revised metric. In contrast, the PFAS CALUX bioassay exceeded the pragmatic effect-based trigger value in 10 of 14 samples and produced discordant classifications at several sites. Target PFASs explained <5% of EOF and generally <3% of the observed bioassay response. Thus, in this river dataset, expansion from PFOS alone to a potency-weighted PFAS mixture did not materially change the chemical screening classification, whereas effect-based assessment revealed a different spatial pattern. EOF provides complementary evidence of a substantial uncharacterized organofluorine burden. However, compared to other studies, it did not provide any insights into PFAS hotspots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxics
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14100866
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From PFOS to a Sum of 25 PFASs: Regulatory and Effect-Based Risk Assessment in the River Ruhr

Jörg Feldmann, Thomas Riedel, Raquel González de Vega, Gerhard Schertzinger et al.
Toxics
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

From PFOS to a Sum of 25 PFASs: Regulatory and Effect-Based Risk Assessment in the River Ruhr

Jörg Feldmann, Thomas Riedel, Raquel González de Vega, Gerhard Schertzinger, Florian Zaun, Viktoria Müller
article en

Abstract

Regulatory assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in European surface waters is shifting from a single-compound environmental quality standard (EQS) for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) toward a potency-weighted sum of 25 PFASs criterion under the revised Water Framework Directive (WFD). This environmental survey investigated how this regulatory change affects screening-level assessment of PFAS contamination and whether chemical classifications are consistent with an effect-based endpoint. Fourteen surface-water samples from the river Ruhr and its tributary, the Möhne (Germany), were enriched by weak anion-exchange solid-phase extraction and analyzed by targeted liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, combustion ion chromatography for extractable organic fluorine (EOF), and the TTR–TRβ chemical activated luciferase gene expression bioassay (referred to as PFAS CALUX). Thirteen PFAS were quantified. At every location with valid target-PFAS data except site A, both the former PFOS annual average EQS of 0.65 ng L−1 and the revised water-column criterion of 4.4 ng PFOA-equivalents L−1 for the sum of 25 PFASs were exceeded when the latter was calculated from the WFD-listed PFASs covered by the analytical method. Because trifluoroacetic acid and perfluor (((5-methoxy-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)oxy)acetic acid) were not measured, this represents a lower-bound estimate of the revised metric. In contrast, the PFAS CALUX bioassay exceeded the pragmatic effect-based trigger value in 10 of 14 samples and produced discordant classifications at several sites. Target PFASs explained <5% of EOF and generally <3% of the observed bioassay response. Thus, in this river dataset, expansion from PFOS alone to a potency-weighted PFAS mixture did not materially change the chemical screening classification, whereas effect-based assessment revealed a different spatial pattern. EOF provides complementary evidence of a substantial uncharacterized organofluorine burden. However, compared to other studies, it did not provide any insights into PFAS hotspots.

ToxicsVol. 14(10)
James Hutton Institute (GB), University of Graz (AT), IWW Water Centre (DE)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.