Signs of compliance: Message framing influences outdoor recreationists' responses to conservation requests

Abstract Natural landscapes shared by people and wildlife often rely on signage to guide people towards behaviours that protect nature, where the justification and framing of these requests may influence how people interpret and respond to them. We conducted a factorial vignette experiment with 600 frequent outdoor recreationists living in Scotland, stratified by age, gender and dog ownership, to test the influence of specific sign features on recreationists' intentions to follow three behavioural requests: keeping dogs on leads, staying on designated trails and avoiding sensitive areas, whilst measuring their perceptions of whether they found requests reasonable. We systematically varied requests by highlighting what the majority of other recreationists do (descriptive norms; ‘nine out of ten people do…’) or requesting the appropriate behaviour outright (injunctive norms; ‘please do…’), and by justifying requests for either single‐species conservation, general biodiversity conservation or for self and pet safety. Overall, we found high intentions of recreationists to follow the three behavioural requests, which varied significantly across our experimental conditions and with participant age. The effectiveness of injunctive versus descriptive norms depended on request type: injunctive framing nearly doubled the odds of higher perceived reasonableness and compliance intentions for a proscriptive request to avoid an area, but had no significant effect on prescriptively worded requests to keep dogs on leads or stay on marked paths. Species‐specific requests outperformed biodiversity and self‐interest requests, but their influence varied by age group. Request justification did not significantly affect perceptions or behavioural intentions among adults aged 18–34. However, requests justified for the conservation of a declining locally iconic umbrella species (Western Capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus ) increased perceived reasonableness and intentions of compliance among older adults, suggesting that conservation messages may be most effective when they connect with existing human–nature relationships. Our findings show that the way behavioural requests are framed and justified on signs influences the way people relate to conservation guidance in shared landscapes. Overall, messages that emphasise locally meaningful species and communicate clear behavioural expectations are more likely to improve overall voluntary cooperation to support sustainable interactions between outdoor recreationists and wildlife. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70445
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Signs of compliance: Message framing influences outdoor recreationists' responses to conservation requests

Xavier Lambin, Chris S. Sutherland, Kenny Kortland, Amber Cowans et al.
People and Nature
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Signs of compliance: Message framing influences outdoor recreationists' responses to conservation requests

Xavier Lambin, Chris S. Sutherland, Kenny Kortland, Amber Cowans, D. Hare
article en

Abstract

Abstract Natural landscapes shared by people and wildlife often rely on signage to guide people towards behaviours that protect nature, where the justification and framing of these requests may influence how people interpret and respond to them. We conducted a factorial vignette experiment with 600 frequent outdoor recreationists living in Scotland, stratified by age, gender and dog ownership, to test the influence of specific sign features on recreationists' intentions to follow three behavioural requests: keeping dogs on leads, staying on designated trails and avoiding sensitive areas, whilst measuring their perceptions of whether they found requests reasonable. We systematically varied requests by highlighting what the majority of other recreationists do (descriptive norms; ‘nine out of ten people do…’) or requesting the appropriate behaviour outright (injunctive norms; ‘please do…’), and by justifying requests for either single‐species conservation, general biodiversity conservation or for self and pet safety. Overall, we found high intentions of recreationists to follow the three behavioural requests, which varied significantly across our experimental conditions and with participant age. The effectiveness of injunctive versus descriptive norms depended on request type: injunctive framing nearly doubled the odds of higher perceived reasonableness and compliance intentions for a proscriptive request to avoid an area, but had no significant effect on prescriptively worded requests to keep dogs on leads or stay on marked paths. Species‐specific requests outperformed biodiversity and self‐interest requests, but their influence varied by age group. Request justification did not significantly affect perceptions or behavioural intentions among adults aged 18–34. However, requests justified for the conservation of a declining locally iconic umbrella species (Western Capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus ) increased perceived reasonableness and intentions of compliance among older adults, suggesting that conservation messages may be most effective when they connect with existing human–nature relationships. Our findings show that the way behavioural requests are framed and justified on signs influences the way people relate to conservation guidance in shared landscapes. Overall, messages that emphasise locally meaningful species and communicate clear behavioural expectations are more likely to improve overall voluntary cooperation to support sustainable interactions between outdoor recreationists and wildlife. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and Nature
University of St Andrews (GB), University of Aberdeen (GB), University of Oxford (GB), The Scottish Forestry Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.