Outcomes after technically successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for conventional indications and high-risk clinical subgroups: a multicenter cohort study

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment for refractory ascites and variceal bleeding. However, its role in special populations such as those with hepatorenal syndrome–acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) remains less defined, which we aimed to assess. In this retrospective study, patients undergoing TIPS across six centers were included. The primary objective was to evaluate transplant-free survival (TFS) following technically successful TIPS. Secondary objectives included descriptive assessment of recorded variceal re-bleeding, complete off-diuretic ascites resolution, hydrothorax response, and post-TIPS complications. TFS associations in high-risk clinical subgroups, including patients with physician-documented HRS-AKI within the preceding three months, chronic kidney disease (CKD), ACLF and splenoportal-axis thrombosis, were evaluated as exploratory analyses. The mean age of the included 207 patients was 55.8 ± 11.7 years, and 73% were men. The most common indications were refractory ascites/hydrothorax (46.8%) and variceal bleeding (39.6%). TFS was 65.2% (135/207; 58.3–71.7). TIPS prevented variceal re-bleeding in 96.3% (79/82) of patients, controlled ascites in 51% (49/97), and resulted in 37.5% complete and 37.5% partial resolution of hydrothorax. TFS was 52.1% in patients with physician-documented HRS-AKI, with ascites control in 51% and prevention of variceal re-bleeding in 89.5%. TFS was 33% in patients with ACLF. After adjustment for recruiting center and baseline disease severity, preceding physician-documented HRS-AKI was not associated with death/transplant either in the Frieberg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS)-based model (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.80–2.55; P = 0.227) or the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-based model (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.88–2.69; P = 0.130). TIPS is safe and effective for controlling variceal bleeding but suboptimal for controlling ascites. The efficacy of TIPS in special populations (HRS-AKI, ACLF) needs further large randomized studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-70413-9
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Outcomes after technically successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for conventional indications and high-risk clinical subgroups: a multicenter cohort study

Daniel Q. Huang, Shantan Venishetty, Nikhil Daniel, Mithun Sharma et al.
Scientific Reports
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

Outcomes after technically successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for conventional indications and high-risk clinical subgroups: a multicenter cohort study

Daniel Q. Huang, Shantan Venishetty, Nikhil Daniel, Mithun Sharma, Vivek Sreekanth, Madhumita Premkumar, Sowmya Iyengar, Anjan Kumar, Anand Vijay Kulkarni, Mark Dhinesh Muthiah, Swati Das, Suprabhat Giri, Manasa Alla, Nagaraja Rao Padaki, Nikhil O. Bansal, D. Nageshwar Reddy, Jignesh Reddy, Akash Roy, Margaret Li Teng Peng, Karan Kumar, Kamarjit Mangat Singh, Peter Chen-Yang, Jagadish Rampal Singh, Heera Ram Chaudhary
article en

Abstract

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment for refractory ascites and variceal bleeding. However, its role in special populations such as those with hepatorenal syndrome–acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) remains less defined, which we aimed to assess. In this retrospective study, patients undergoing TIPS across six centers were included. The primary objective was to evaluate transplant-free survival (TFS) following technically successful TIPS. Secondary objectives included descriptive assessment of recorded variceal re-bleeding, complete off-diuretic ascites resolution, hydrothorax response, and post-TIPS complications. TFS associations in high-risk clinical subgroups, including patients with physician-documented HRS-AKI within the preceding three months, chronic kidney disease (CKD), ACLF and splenoportal-axis thrombosis, were evaluated as exploratory analyses. The mean age of the included 207 patients was 55.8 ± 11.7 years, and 73% were men. The most common indications were refractory ascites/hydrothorax (46.8%) and variceal bleeding (39.6%). TFS was 65.2% (135/207; 58.3–71.7). TIPS prevented variceal re-bleeding in 96.3% (79/82) of patients, controlled ascites in 51% (49/97), and resulted in 37.5% complete and 37.5% partial resolution of hydrothorax. TFS was 52.1% in patients with physician-documented HRS-AKI, with ascites control in 51% and prevention of variceal re-bleeding in 89.5%. TFS was 33% in patients with ACLF. After adjustment for recruiting center and baseline disease severity, preceding physician-documented HRS-AKI was not associated with death/transplant either in the Frieberg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS)-based model (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.80–2.55; P = 0.227) or the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-based model (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.88–2.69; P = 0.130). TIPS is safe and effective for controlling variceal bleeding but suboptimal for controlling ascites. The efficacy of TIPS in special populations (HRS-AKI, ACLF) needs further large randomized studies.

Scientific Reports
Gandhi Medical College & Hospital (IN), National University of Singapore (SG), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar (IN), Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (IN), National University Hospital (SG), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.