Industrial Waste Management for a Circular Economy: Critical Perspectives on Prevention, Recovery, Treatment, and Resource Valorization

Industrial waste management is often framed as technology selection, although sustainability depends on prevention, material quality, residual fate, and the displacement of primary production. This purposive critical integrative review examines industrial wastewater, sludges, and solid production residues using 106 cited sources: 42 retained papers from an initial 47-paper full-text collection and 64 complementary sources. It does not claim systematic or exhaustive coverage. The synthesis compares prevention, industrial symbiosis, treatment and recovery through functional equivalence, representative operating conditions, mass and energy balances, and life-cycle trade-offs. A retrospective audit identifies four retained studies at controlled-experiment level, one with continuous laboratory operation, one with field-pilot evidence, and one with enterprise-scale evidence; the other 35 provide review, observational, or modelling evidence rather than operational validation. High removal or yield can coexist with intensive chemical use, secondary residues, uncertain substitution, and fragile economics. The resulting five-gate framework operationalizes recurring evidence gaps through prevention, representative performance, residual and exposure control, life-cycle sustainability and economic additionality, and implementation feasibility. Its contribution is an evidence-linked checklist, not a new assessment method or validated technology ranking. Environmental LCA, techno-economic assessment, social LCA, and explicitly framed carbon accounting support the gates. Decisions should advance only when the information needed for the next commitment is available; unresolved safety or burden-transfer risks require redesign rather than an automatic move to more intensive treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environments
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13100543
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Industrial Waste Management for a Circular Economy: Critical Perspectives on Prevention, Recovery, Treatment, and Resource Valorization

Madhusudhan Bangalore Ramu, Murat Eyvaz, Nurullah Özdoğan, Hazlami Fikri Basri et al.
Environments
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
article

Industrial Waste Management for a Circular Economy: Critical Perspectives on Prevention, Recovery, Treatment, and Resource Valorization

Madhusudhan Bangalore Ramu, Murat Eyvaz, Nurullah Özdoğan, Hazlami Fikri Basri, Motasem Y.D. Alazaiza, Ahmed M. Albahnasawi, Obie Farobie
article en

Abstract

Industrial waste management is often framed as technology selection, although sustainability depends on prevention, material quality, residual fate, and the displacement of primary production. This purposive critical integrative review examines industrial wastewater, sludges, and solid production residues using 106 cited sources: 42 retained papers from an initial 47-paper full-text collection and 64 complementary sources. It does not claim systematic or exhaustive coverage. The synthesis compares prevention, industrial symbiosis, treatment and recovery through functional equivalence, representative operating conditions, mass and energy balances, and life-cycle trade-offs. A retrospective audit identifies four retained studies at controlled-experiment level, one with continuous laboratory operation, one with field-pilot evidence, and one with enterprise-scale evidence; the other 35 provide review, observational, or modelling evidence rather than operational validation. High removal or yield can coexist with intensive chemical use, secondary residues, uncertain substitution, and fragile economics. The resulting five-gate framework operationalizes recurring evidence gaps through prevention, representative performance, residual and exposure control, life-cycle sustainability and economic additionality, and implementation feasibility. Its contribution is an evidence-linked checklist, not a new assessment method or validated technology ranking. Environmental LCA, techno-economic assessment, social LCA, and explicitly framed carbon accounting support the gates. Decisions should advance only when the information needed for the next commitment is available; unresolved safety or burden-transfer risks require redesign rather than an automatic move to more intensive treatment.

EnvironmentsVol. 13(10)
Gebze Technical University (TR), Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR), IPB University (ID), A'Sharqiyah University, University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.