PS10-19. Prediction Models for in vitro Nutrient Disappearance of Fish Meal for Pigs.

Abstract Fish meal (FM) is often used in nursery pig diets. An accurate determination of nutrient utilization in FM is crucial for precise swine feed formulation. As a more cost-effective alternative to animal experiments, in vitro procedures have been employed to evaluate nutrient utilization of feeds fed to pigs. The objectives were to determine in vitro ileal disappearance (IVID) and in vitro total tract disappearance (IVTTD) of nutrients in FM and to develop prediction models for IVID of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) and IVTTD of DM and organic matter (OM) in FM based on their chemical composition. Eight sources of FM were analyzed for DM, gross energy, ash, CP, and ether extract (EE) concentrations. The FM were tested for IVID and IVTTD of nutrients using a 2-step procedure simulating digestion and absorption in the stomach and small intestine and a 3-step procedure simulating digestion and absorption in the stomach, small intestine, and large intestine of pigs, respectively. Ash, CP, and EE in the FM ranged from 13.8% to 22.1%, 54.8% to 69.8%, and 6.9% to 12.6%, respectively, on an as-is basis. The IVID of CP in FM varied from 75.2% to 89.5% (SEM = 0.5; P < 0.001) and IVTTD of OM varied from 83.3% to 93.5% (SEM = 0.4; P < 0.001). The CP concentration was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with the IVID of DM and IVID of CP, whereas the EE concentration was negatively correlated (P < 0.05) with the IVID of CP, IVTTD of DM, and IVTTD of OM. Prediction models developed for IVID of DM and CP in FM were: IVID of DM (%) = –22.5 + 1.20 × ash + 1.37 × CP (R² = 0.91; P < 0.001); IVID of CP (%) = 60.6 + 0.58 × CP – 1.37 × EE (R2 = 0.92; P < 0.001) where nutrients are in % as-is. Prediction equations for IVTTD of DM and OM in FM were: IVTTD of DM (%) = 35.5 + 0.80 × ash + 0.77 × CP – 0.83 × EE (R2 = 0.75; P < 0.001); IVTTD of OM (%) = 20.8 + 0.99 × ash + 0.93 × CP – 0.82 × EE (R2 = 0.86; P < 0.001). In conclusion, in vitro nutrient disappearance in FM is variable and the chemical composition of FM can be used to estimate in vitro nutrient disappearance of nutrients for pigs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.521
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

PS10-19. Prediction Models for in vitro Nutrient Disappearance of Fish Meal for Pigs.

Yeojin An, Beob Gyun Kim, Anh Ngoc Thi Dang
Journal of Animal Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

PS10-19. Prediction Models for in vitro Nutrient Disappearance of Fish Meal for Pigs.

Yeojin An, Beob Gyun Kim, Anh Ngoc Thi Dang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fish meal (FM) is often used in nursery pig diets. An accurate determination of nutrient utilization in FM is crucial for precise swine feed formulation. As a more cost-effective alternative to animal experiments, in vitro procedures have been employed to evaluate nutrient utilization of feeds fed to pigs. The objectives were to determine in vitro ileal disappearance (IVID) and in vitro total tract disappearance (IVTTD) of nutrients in FM and to develop prediction models for IVID of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) and IVTTD of DM and organic matter (OM) in FM based on their chemical composition. Eight sources of FM were analyzed for DM, gross energy, ash, CP, and ether extract (EE) concentrations. The FM were tested for IVID and IVTTD of nutrients using a 2-step procedure simulating digestion and absorption in the stomach and small intestine and a 3-step procedure simulating digestion and absorption in the stomach, small intestine, and large intestine of pigs, respectively. Ash, CP, and EE in the FM ranged from 13.8% to 22.1%, 54.8% to 69.8%, and 6.9% to 12.6%, respectively, on an as-is basis. The IVID of CP in FM varied from 75.2% to 89.5% (SEM = 0.5; P < 0.001) and IVTTD of OM varied from 83.3% to 93.5% (SEM = 0.4; P < 0.001). The CP concentration was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with the IVID of DM and IVID of CP, whereas the EE concentration was negatively correlated (P < 0.05) with the IVID of CP, IVTTD of DM, and IVTTD of OM. Prediction models developed for IVID of DM and CP in FM were: IVID of DM (%) = –22.5 + 1.20 × ash + 1.37 × CP (R² = 0.91; P < 0.001); IVID of CP (%) = 60.6 + 0.58 × CP – 1.37 × EE (R2 = 0.92; P < 0.001) where nutrients are in % as-is. Prediction equations for IVTTD of DM and OM in FM were: IVTTD of DM (%) = 35.5 + 0.80 × ash + 0.77 × CP – 0.83 × EE (R2 = 0.75; P < 0.001); IVTTD of OM (%) = 20.8 + 0.99 × ash + 0.93 × CP – 0.82 × EE (R2 = 0.86; P < 0.001). In conclusion, in vitro nutrient disappearance in FM is variable and the chemical composition of FM can be used to estimate in vitro nutrient disappearance of nutrients for pigs.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_5)
Konkuk University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.