Coded Healing Abutment Impression Accuracy in Partially Edentulous Models: An In Vitro Study

Objectives To evaluate the accuracy of a coded healing abutment (CHA) across different impression workflows and partially edentulous configurations, using an impression coping (IC) as the comparator in the conventional workflow and an intraoral scan body (ISB) in the digital workflow. Methods In this in vitro study, eight posterior partially edentulous master models representing different defect configurations (U6, U67, U46, U47, B6, B67, B46, and B47) were fabricated and digitized as reference datasets. For each master model, conventional impressions were made 10 times each with ICs and CHAs, and digital impressions were obtained 10 times each with ISBs and CHAs using Primescan, iTero Lumina, Aoralscan Elite, and Trios 5. Trueness and precision were calculated as root mean square deviations of the virtual analogue surfaces. Trueness and precision were analysed using Gamma regression models with Holm adjustment, applying a generalized linear model and a generalized linear mixed-effects model, respectively. Results Under the conventional workflow, CHA showed trueness comparable to that of IC in all configurations except U6, where it was significantly better, and showed significantly higher precision in most configurations. Under the digital workflow, CHA generally showed trueness and precision comparable to those of ISB across the tested scanners and defect configurations. Significantly better trueness was observed only in selected configurations, including U6 and B46 with Aoralscan Elite, U67 with iTero Lumina, and U6 with Trios 5. Significantly better precision was also limited to selected configurations, most frequently with Primescan and iTero Lumina. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro study, CHA showed trueness and precision broadly comparable to those of ICs and ISBs across multiple partially edentulous configurations, with superior performance in selected conditions. Clinical significance CHA may serve as a feasible alternative impression component in both conventional and digital workflows under the tested in vitro conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.111191
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Coded Healing Abutment Impression Accuracy in Partially Edentulous Models: An In Vitro Study

Hui Dong Cheng, Zi Wang, Yinghui Wang, Yiling Cheng et al.
International Dental Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

Coded Healing Abutment Impression Accuracy in Partially Edentulous Models: An In Vitro Study

Hui Dong Cheng, Zi Wang, Yinghui Wang, Yiling Cheng, Heyuan Zhang, Shenglan Wu, Xing Chen, Zongxu Li, Yu Pan
article en

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the accuracy of a coded healing abutment (CHA) across different impression workflows and partially edentulous configurations, using an impression coping (IC) as the comparator in the conventional workflow and an intraoral scan body (ISB) in the digital workflow. Methods In this in vitro study, eight posterior partially edentulous master models representing different defect configurations (U6, U67, U46, U47, B6, B67, B46, and B47) were fabricated and digitized as reference datasets. For each master model, conventional impressions were made 10 times each with ICs and CHAs, and digital impressions were obtained 10 times each with ISBs and CHAs using Primescan, iTero Lumina, Aoralscan Elite, and Trios 5. Trueness and precision were calculated as root mean square deviations of the virtual analogue surfaces. Trueness and precision were analysed using Gamma regression models with Holm adjustment, applying a generalized linear model and a generalized linear mixed-effects model, respectively. Results Under the conventional workflow, CHA showed trueness comparable to that of IC in all configurations except U6, where it was significantly better, and showed significantly higher precision in most configurations. Under the digital workflow, CHA generally showed trueness and precision comparable to those of ISB across the tested scanners and defect configurations. Significantly better trueness was observed only in selected configurations, including U6 and B46 with Aoralscan Elite, U67 with iTero Lumina, and U6 with Trios 5. Significantly better precision was also limited to selected configurations, most frequently with Primescan and iTero Lumina. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro study, CHA showed trueness and precision broadly comparable to those of ICs and ISBs across multiple partially edentulous configurations, with superior performance in selected conditions. Clinical significance CHA may serve as a feasible alternative impression component in both conventional and digital workflows under the tested in vitro conditions.

International Dental JournalVol. 76(6)
Fujian Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.