Neglected Interproximal Friction During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: An Iterative Biomechanical Analysis

Introduction and aims To examine the biomechanical effects of interproximal friction on anchorage preservation during orthodontic space closure with sliding mechanics. Methods A mandibular second premolar extraction finite element analysis (FEA) model was constructed, where mesial translation of the first mandibular molar with sliding mechanics was simulated. Three ligation methods (self-ligation, passive and active continuous ligation), each with 3 friction coefficient configurations (μ) were analysed using iterative biomechanical analysis. Results Active continuous ligation minimised anchorage loss (31.5% reduction in premolar displacement vs passive continuous ligation/self-ligation at μ = 0.2) while achieving comparable molar mesial displacement (2.59-2.60 mm). After complete space closure, active ligation reduced central incisor lingual tipping by 0.80 mm and premolar distal displacement by 0.67 mm. Higher μ values reduced anterior anchorage loss. All groups exhibited two-phase displacement dynamics: rapid tooth movement during the teeth tipping stage followed by stabilised sliding during the sliding stage. Active continuous ligation groups exhibited notably higher interproximal forces than the other ligation groups. With μ = 0.2, interproximal friction in active continuous ligation was notably greater than in other groups. Conclusion Interproximal friction influenced anchorage efficacy, with greater interproximal friction enhancing grouped-teeth anterior anchorage. The concept of ‘passive range of group teeth’ is proposed, suggesting that interproximal friction may affect the expression of the bracket’s passive range. Clinical Significance Active continuous ligation enhances grouped-teeth anchorage, while passive continuous and self-ligation led to the same amount of anterior anchorage loss. However, FEA results should be complemented by additional clinical evidence before establishing more definitive conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.111186
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Neglected Interproximal Friction During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: An Iterative Biomechanical Analysis

María Cadenas de Llano‐Pérula, 谷岩, Bochun Mao, Zuodong Zhao et al.
International Dental Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Neglected Interproximal Friction During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: An Iterative Biomechanical Analysis

María Cadenas de Llano‐Pérula, 谷岩, Bochun Mao, Zuodong Zhao, Hanzhang Zhou, Yajing Tian
article en

Abstract

Introduction and aims To examine the biomechanical effects of interproximal friction on anchorage preservation during orthodontic space closure with sliding mechanics. Methods A mandibular second premolar extraction finite element analysis (FEA) model was constructed, where mesial translation of the first mandibular molar with sliding mechanics was simulated. Three ligation methods (self-ligation, passive and active continuous ligation), each with 3 friction coefficient configurations (μ) were analysed using iterative biomechanical analysis. Results Active continuous ligation minimised anchorage loss (31.5% reduction in premolar displacement vs passive continuous ligation/self-ligation at μ = 0.2) while achieving comparable molar mesial displacement (2.59-2.60 mm). After complete space closure, active ligation reduced central incisor lingual tipping by 0.80 mm and premolar distal displacement by 0.67 mm. Higher μ values reduced anterior anchorage loss. All groups exhibited two-phase displacement dynamics: rapid tooth movement during the teeth tipping stage followed by stabilised sliding during the sliding stage. Active continuous ligation groups exhibited notably higher interproximal forces than the other ligation groups. With μ = 0.2, interproximal friction in active continuous ligation was notably greater than in other groups. Conclusion Interproximal friction influenced anchorage efficacy, with greater interproximal friction enhancing grouped-teeth anterior anchorage. The concept of ‘passive range of group teeth’ is proposed, suggesting that interproximal friction may affect the expression of the bracket’s passive range. Clinical Significance Active continuous ligation enhances grouped-teeth anchorage, while passive continuous and self-ligation led to the same amount of anterior anchorage loss. However, FEA results should be complemented by additional clinical evidence before establishing more definitive conclusions.

International Dental JournalVol. 76(6)
China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CN), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.