Selling mode strategy and streamer choice in a live-streaming supply chain considering product returns

Live-streaming e-commerce has revolutionised retail by enabling real-time interactions between brand owners, streamers, and consumers, which makes it an indispensable marketing tool for today’s brand owners. Considering the various types of streamers and high possibility of product returns in live-streaming, this study explores optimal strategies for brand owners in choosing live-streaming selling modes and streamers for product promotion. We find that no strategy is universally superior: the best choice depends on return costs, bargaining power, the streamer’s influence, and pit fees. Commission-based collaboration is more effective for influential streamers, especially if the cost of return is not high. In contrast, using employee streamers can be more profitable when the return cost is high or brands possess strong bargaining power. Notably, our research indicates that brand owners can still achieve profit when partnering with highly influential streamers, even if they give up pricing power, absorb return costs, and pay streamer commissions. This study provides crucial insights for brand owners in live-streaming e-commerce regarding streamer selection, mode choice, and effective management of returns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2026.2731153
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Selling mode strategy and streamer choice in a live-streaming supply chain considering product returns

Yi Tao, Qiang Lin, Xianjun Yan, Meiping Wang
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
article

Selling mode strategy and streamer choice in a live-streaming supply chain considering product returns

Yi Tao, Qiang Lin, Xianjun Yan, Meiping Wang
article en

Abstract

Live-streaming e-commerce has revolutionised retail by enabling real-time interactions between brand owners, streamers, and consumers, which makes it an indispensable marketing tool for today’s brand owners. Considering the various types of streamers and high possibility of product returns in live-streaming, this study explores optimal strategies for brand owners in choosing live-streaming selling modes and streamers for product promotion. We find that no strategy is universally superior: the best choice depends on return costs, bargaining power, the streamer’s influence, and pit fees. Commission-based collaboration is more effective for influential streamers, especially if the cost of return is not high. In contrast, using employee streamers can be more profitable when the return cost is high or brands possess strong bargaining power. Notably, our research indicates that brand owners can still achieve profit when partnering with highly influential streamers, even if they give up pricing power, absorb return costs, and pay streamer commissions. This study provides crucial insights for brand owners in live-streaming e-commerce regarding streamer selection, mode choice, and effective management of returns.

Journal of the Operational Research Society
Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Selling mode strategy and streamer choice in a live-streaming supply chain considering product returns — Yi Tao, Qiang Lin, et al. · Journal of the Operational Research Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS