What to do with K-wires in displaced upper extremity fractures in children – where to bury or not

Abstract Kirschner wires (K-wires) are the standard fixation method for displaced pediatric upper extremity fractures, yet no consensus exists on whether wire ends should be buried subcutaneously or left exposed epicutaneously. While epicutaneous K-wires offer cost-effectiveness and avoid second anesthesia, concerns remain regarding infection risk and psychological distress. To systematically review and compare complication rates between buried and exposed K-wire fixation in pediatric upper extremity fractures, including infection, refracture, skin erosion, and secondary implant displacement. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Cochrane, PubMed, EmBase, and Ovid databases. Inclusion criteria were: modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) > 60, upper extremity fractures treated with K-wire fixation, and age < 16 years. Studies including adult patients and biomechanical studies were excluded. Meta-analysis compared outcomes across 12 studies encompassing 1,977 patients. Buried K-wires demonstrated significantly lower overall infection rates (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.19–2.56; p = 0.004). However, no significant difference was observed in deep surgical siteinfections ( OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 0.60–4.0; p = 0.36 ). Exposed wires showed significantly lower skin irritation rates (OR = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.04–0.21; p < 0.00001). No significant differences were found in secondary implant displacement (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.10–15.75; p = 0.86) or refracture rates (OR = 1.90; 95% CI: 0.91–3.96; p = 0.09). Geographic subgroup analysis revealed significant regional differences: infection rate differences were significant in Asia/Africa (OR = 2.90; 95% CI: 1.61–5.22; p = 0.0004) but not in Europe/USA (OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.69–1.95; p = 0.57). Epicutaneous K-wire fixation shows higher overall infection rates than buried wires but does not increase deep surgical site infections requiring operative revision. Considering the avoidance of additional anesthesia, favorable cost-benefit profile, and geographic variation in infection risk, epicutaneous K-wires are recommended when no patient-specific contraindications exist, particularly in temperate climates. Level III (Systematic Review of Level II-III Studies).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-026-03353-8
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

What to do with K-wires in displaced upper extremity fractures in children – where to bury or not

Carlotta Pietsch, Andreas Frodl, Kerstin F. Kuminack, Ferdinand Christian Wagner et al.
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Bone fractures and treatments
article

What to do with K-wires in displaced upper extremity fractures in children – where to bury or not

Carlotta Pietsch, Andreas Frodl, Kerstin F. Kuminack, Ferdinand Christian Wagner, Hagen Schmal, Benjamin Erdle, Nils Mühlenfeld, Nikos Karvouniaris, Markus Siegel, Marietta Borbely
article en

Abstract

Abstract Kirschner wires (K-wires) are the standard fixation method for displaced pediatric upper extremity fractures, yet no consensus exists on whether wire ends should be buried subcutaneously or left exposed epicutaneously. While epicutaneous K-wires offer cost-effectiveness and avoid second anesthesia, concerns remain regarding infection risk and psychological distress. To systematically review and compare complication rates between buried and exposed K-wire fixation in pediatric upper extremity fractures, including infection, refracture, skin erosion, and secondary implant displacement. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Cochrane, PubMed, EmBase, and Ovid databases. Inclusion criteria were: modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) > 60, upper extremity fractures treated with K-wire fixation, and age < 16 years. Studies including adult patients and biomechanical studies were excluded. Meta-analysis compared outcomes across 12 studies encompassing 1,977 patients. Buried K-wires demonstrated significantly lower overall infection rates (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.19–2.56; p = 0.004). However, no significant difference was observed in deep surgical siteinfections ( OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 0.60–4.0; p = 0.36 ). Exposed wires showed significantly lower skin irritation rates (OR = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.04–0.21; p < 0.00001). No significant differences were found in secondary implant displacement (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.10–15.75; p = 0.86) or refracture rates (OR = 1.90; 95% CI: 0.91–3.96; p = 0.09). Geographic subgroup analysis revealed significant regional differences: infection rate differences were significant in Asia/Africa (OR = 2.90; 95% CI: 1.61–5.22; p = 0.0004) but not in Europe/USA (OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.69–1.95; p = 0.57). Epicutaneous K-wire fixation shows higher overall infection rates than buried wires but does not increase deep surgical site infections requiring operative revision. Considering the avoidance of additional anesthesia, favorable cost-benefit profile, and geographic variation in infection risk, epicutaneous K-wires are recommended when no patient-specific contraindications exist, particularly in temperate climates. Level III (Systematic Review of Level II-III Studies).

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency SurgeryVol. 52(1)
University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Odense University Hospital (DK), St. Josefskrankenhaus Freiburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.