A Learning-Centred Conceptual Framework of Technology Acceptance in Vocational Education: A Systematic Review

Digital transformation has reshaped technical and vocational education and training (TVET), accelerating the adoption of learning management systems, mobile learning, immersive technologies, and AI-enabled instructional tools. Although technology acceptance has been widely studied, existing research remains theoretically fragmented and insufficiently synthesised within vocational contexts characterised by practice-oriented, skill-based, and industry-aligned learning.This study presents a systematic review of approximately 100 empirical and review studies published between 1989 and 2025, guided by PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Integrating perspectives from the Technology Acceptance Model, UTAUT/UTAUT2, Social Cognitive Theory, the Stimulus–Organism–Response framework, and learning sciences, the review identifies four overarching categories of factors influencing technology acceptance in TVET: technical, psychological, environmental and institutional, and cognitive–affective mechanisms.The findings demonstrate that technology acceptance in vocational education is a multi-level, learning-centred process shaped by learners’ cognitive processing, emotional experience, motivation, and engagement. Building on this synthesis, the study proposes an integrated conceptual framework that embeds technology acceptance within the pedagogical and institutional context of TVET, highlighting procedural learning, authenticity, industry alignment, and cultural context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v15-i3/28718
Primary Topic
Technostress in Professional Settings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Learning-Centred Conceptual Framework of Technology Acceptance in Vocational Education: A Systematic Review

Li Lanxin
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Technostress in Professional Settings
article

A Learning-Centred Conceptual Framework of Technology Acceptance in Vocational Education: A Systematic Review

Li Lanxin
article en

Abstract

Digital transformation has reshaped technical and vocational education and training (TVET), accelerating the adoption of learning management systems, mobile learning, immersive technologies, and AI-enabled instructional tools. Although technology acceptance has been widely studied, existing research remains theoretically fragmented and insufficiently synthesised within vocational contexts characterised by practice-oriented, skill-based, and industry-aligned learning.This study presents a systematic review of approximately 100 empirical and review studies published between 1989 and 2025, guided by PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Integrating perspectives from the Technology Acceptance Model, UTAUT/UTAUT2, Social Cognitive Theory, the Stimulus–Organism–Response framework, and learning sciences, the review identifies four overarching categories of factors influencing technology acceptance in TVET: technical, psychological, environmental and institutional, and cognitive–affective mechanisms.The findings demonstrate that technology acceptance in vocational education is a multi-level, learning-centred process shaped by learners’ cognitive processing, emotional experience, motivation, and engagement. Building on this synthesis, the study proposes an integrated conceptual framework that embeds technology acceptance within the pedagogical and institutional context of TVET, highlighting procedural learning, authenticity, industry alignment, and cultural context.

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and DevelopmentVol. 15(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Technostress in Professional Settings
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.