3D Bioprinting for Breast Cancer Modelling, Diagnosis, Therapeutic Testing, and Clinical Translation

Breast cancer remains a highly heterogeneous disease, and conventional two-dimensional cell cultures and animal models do not fully reproduce the complexity of the human tumor microenvironment. More physiologically relevant in vitro platforms are therefore needed to improve disease modelling and preclinical therapeutic evaluation. In this review article, recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting for breast cancer modelling, diagnosis, therapeutic testing, and clinical translation are discussed. A PRISMA ScR-guided search of Scopus was conducted for studies published between 2015 and July 2026, resulting in 74 selected sources. A complementary bibliometric analysis of 129 Scopus-indexed documents was also performed to identify publication trends and major research directions. The review also covers bioprinting techniques, bioink formulations, crosslinking strategies, and multicellular breast tumor models. Particular attention is given to extrusion-based approaches using alginate-, gelatin, collagen, fibrin, and composite-based bioinks, as well as light-based bioprinting strategies employing photocrosslinkable methacrylate bioinks, including but not limited to gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), collagen methacrylate (ColMA), and hyaluronic acid methacrylate (HAMA), decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks, as well as patient-derived, vascularized, and tumor-on-chip systems. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that 3D bioprinting provides improved control over tumor architecture, cell–matrix interactions, stromal organization, and therapeutic-response studies. Finally, standardization, regulation, governance, reproducibility, vascularization, immune integration, scalability, and clinical validation that remain as critical challenges for translation into precision oncology are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10100519
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

3D Bioprinting for Breast Cancer Modelling, Diagnosis, Therapeutic Testing, and Clinical Translation

Juan Jose Uriarte, Jorge Troconis, Frederico B. De Sousa, Óscar Casanova-Carvajal et al.
Journal of Composites Science
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

3D Bioprinting for Breast Cancer Modelling, Diagnosis, Therapeutic Testing, and Clinical Translation

Juan Jose Uriarte, Jorge Troconis, Frederico B. De Sousa, Óscar Casanova-Carvajal, Camilo Zamora‐Ledezma, Joan Manuel Rodríguez-Díaz, CRISTINA DE LA MACORRA GARCIA, Eliana Díaz-Cruces, Stephanie Marina Díaz-López, Victricia Aku Turkson
article en

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a highly heterogeneous disease, and conventional two-dimensional cell cultures and animal models do not fully reproduce the complexity of the human tumor microenvironment. More physiologically relevant in vitro platforms are therefore needed to improve disease modelling and preclinical therapeutic evaluation. In this review article, recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting for breast cancer modelling, diagnosis, therapeutic testing, and clinical translation are discussed. A PRISMA ScR-guided search of Scopus was conducted for studies published between 2015 and July 2026, resulting in 74 selected sources. A complementary bibliometric analysis of 129 Scopus-indexed documents was also performed to identify publication trends and major research directions. The review also covers bioprinting techniques, bioink formulations, crosslinking strategies, and multicellular breast tumor models. Particular attention is given to extrusion-based approaches using alginate-, gelatin, collagen, fibrin, and composite-based bioinks, as well as light-based bioprinting strategies employing photocrosslinkable methacrylate bioinks, including but not limited to gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), collagen methacrylate (ColMA), and hyaluronic acid methacrylate (HAMA), decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks, as well as patient-derived, vascularized, and tumor-on-chip systems. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that 3D bioprinting provides improved control over tumor architecture, cell–matrix interactions, stromal organization, and therapeutic-response studies. Finally, standardization, regulation, governance, reproducibility, vascularization, immune integration, scalability, and clinical validation that remain as critical challenges for translation into precision oncology are discussed.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 10(10)
Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (VE), Universidad Nebrija (ES), Universidad a Distancia de Madrid (ES), Universidad Técnica de Manabí (EC), Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (ES), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES), Universidade Federal de Itajubá (BR), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.