Economic warfare through informal imperialism: The pre–World War II struggle for Chinese tungsten between Britain and Nazi Germany

This article unravels the struggle between Nazi Germany and Britain over Chinese tungsten ores in the run-up to World War II. Tungsten was highly strategic, akin to today’s rare earth elements. Its use in special alloys could dramatically increase the speed of armaments production, and China was by far the largest and cheapest producer. While Germany sought to secure access to Chinese ores through semi-private firms and barter deals, Britain attempted to impede German procurement efforts by relying on state-affiliated firms as well as state-guaranteed loans. As this article demonstrates, Germany obtained substantial quantities of Chinese tungsten ore, and Britain’s strategic aim of denying access proved largely ineffective. This outcome can partly be attributed to diverging government–business relations: Germany operated a system of proxy firms that advanced state strategic objectives, whereas Britain’s role as a facilitator of trade and finance left it more reliant on voluntary cooperation from firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business History
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2026.2724932
Primary Topic
European history and politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Economic warfare through informal imperialism: The pre–World War II struggle for Chinese tungsten between Britain and Nazi Germany

Simon Renner
Business History
European history and politics
article

Economic warfare through informal imperialism: The pre–World War II struggle for Chinese tungsten between Britain and Nazi Germany

Simon Renner
article en

Abstract

This article unravels the struggle between Nazi Germany and Britain over Chinese tungsten ores in the run-up to World War II. Tungsten was highly strategic, akin to today’s rare earth elements. Its use in special alloys could dramatically increase the speed of armaments production, and China was by far the largest and cheapest producer. While Germany sought to secure access to Chinese ores through semi-private firms and barter deals, Britain attempted to impede German procurement efforts by relying on state-affiliated firms as well as state-guaranteed loans. As this article demonstrates, Germany obtained substantial quantities of Chinese tungsten ore, and Britain’s strategic aim of denying access proved largely ineffective. This outcome can partly be attributed to diverging government–business relations: Germany operated a system of proxy firms that advanced state strategic objectives, whereas Britain’s role as a facilitator of trade and finance left it more reliant on voluntary cooperation from firms.

Business History
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European history and politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Economic warfare through informal imperialism: The pre–World War II struggle for Chinese tungsten between Britain and Nazi Germany — Simon Renner · Business History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS