From ‘they will make good watch dogs’ to ‘shoot them’

Abstract This study examines hate speech against irregular migrants in Malaysia based on Facebook comments posted in response to an Al Jazeera report on crackdowns on migrants during the COVID-19 period. Assimakopoulos’s (2020) speech-act framework and Culpeper’s (2011) notion of impoliteness are employed to analyze hate speech as an incitement continuum reinforced by impoliteness. The findings show that hate speech is realized mainly through discriminatory incitement rather than overtly violent expressions, suggesting that exclusion is often normalized through everyday online discourse. The analysis further reveals that discriminatory, dehumanizing, and violent speech operate at different levels of hostility to construct migrants as burdens, threats, and illegitimate outsiders. Further, the data show that implicational impoliteness intensifies hostility toward migrants. The findings suggest that indirect forms of hostility play a central role in sustaining xenophobic attitudes, highlighting the need to identify subtle discursive forms that normalize mistreatment and harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Politics
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.25120.zai
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From ‘they will make good watch dogs’ to ‘shoot them’

Najah Zainal Abidin
Journal of Language and Politics
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

From ‘they will make good watch dogs’ to ‘shoot them’

Najah Zainal Abidin
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines hate speech against irregular migrants in Malaysia based on Facebook comments posted in response to an Al Jazeera report on crackdowns on migrants during the COVID-19 period. Assimakopoulos’s (2020) speech-act framework and Culpeper’s (2011) notion of impoliteness are employed to analyze hate speech as an incitement continuum reinforced by impoliteness. The findings show that hate speech is realized mainly through discriminatory incitement rather than overtly violent expressions, suggesting that exclusion is often normalized through everyday online discourse. The analysis further reveals that discriminatory, dehumanizing, and violent speech operate at different levels of hostility to construct migrants as burdens, threats, and illegitimate outsiders. Further, the data show that implicational impoliteness intensifies hostility toward migrants. The findings suggest that indirect forms of hostility play a central role in sustaining xenophobic attitudes, highlighting the need to identify subtle discursive forms that normalize mistreatment and harm.

Journal of Language and Politics
University of Malaya (MY)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From ‘they will make good watch dogs’ to ‘shoot them’ — Najah Zainal Abidin · Journal of Language and Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS