Long‐Term Expansion, Ecosystem Services and Management Trade‐Offs of Phragmites karka in Asia's Largest Lagoon

ABSTRACT Coastal lagoons are increasingly altered by hydrological modification and catchment‐derived nutrient loading, driving shifts in macrophyte dominance and creating complex management trade‐offs. In Chilika lagoon, India, the emergent macrophyte Phragmites karka has expanded, raising concerns about impacts on native macrophytes, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity. We integrated Landsat imagery (1991–2025) with field measurements of water quality, sediment biogeochemistry, metal accumulation and population demography to evaluate its expansion implications. P. karka exhibited alternating phases of expansion and contraction, and occupied approximately 8611.21 ha in 2025. Established stands occurred under low‐salinity, and reducing conditions, and contained sediment carbon and nitrogen stocks of 50.09 ± 18.11 Mg C ha −1 and 4.81 ± 1.60 Mg N ha −1 , corresponding to approximately 0.43 million Mg C and 41,420 Mg N across the extent. Metals were below‐detection limits in surface waters but accumulated in sediments and plant tissues, with biota‐sediment accumulation factors > 1 for Mn, Ni and Co. Population demography indicated recruitment and positive growth, suggesting persistence under prevailing conditions. These findings document habitat‐specific biogeochemical attributes, but do not imply that they outweigh biodiversity concerns, establish conservation equivalence with native habitats or alter the invasive status of P. karka . Management should remain site‐specific: restoration, nutrient‐source reduction, hydrological rehabilitation, containment and removal should be prioritized where native‐community recovery is feasible or sensitive habitats are threatened. Monitored temporary retention may be considered only where restoration is constrained, risks to sensitive habitats and native communities are low and rapid removal could mobilize sediments, nutrients or contaminants. Decisions should remain conditional, reversible and periodically reassessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.70469
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Long‐Term Expansion, Ecosystem Services and Management Trade‐Offs of Phragmites karka in Asia's Largest Lagoon

Amrit Kumar Mishra, Syed Hilal Farooq, Shashi Kant, Anjalis Mishra
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

Long‐Term Expansion, Ecosystem Services and Management Trade‐Offs of Phragmites karka in Asia's Largest Lagoon

Amrit Kumar Mishra, Syed Hilal Farooq, Shashi Kant, Anjalis Mishra
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Coastal lagoons are increasingly altered by hydrological modification and catchment‐derived nutrient loading, driving shifts in macrophyte dominance and creating complex management trade‐offs. In Chilika lagoon, India, the emergent macrophyte Phragmites karka has expanded, raising concerns about impacts on native macrophytes, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity. We integrated Landsat imagery (1991–2025) with field measurements of water quality, sediment biogeochemistry, metal accumulation and population demography to evaluate its expansion implications. P. karka exhibited alternating phases of expansion and contraction, and occupied approximately 8611.21 ha in 2025. Established stands occurred under low‐salinity, and reducing conditions, and contained sediment carbon and nitrogen stocks of 50.09 ± 18.11 Mg C ha −1 and 4.81 ± 1.60 Mg N ha −1 , corresponding to approximately 0.43 million Mg C and 41,420 Mg N across the extent. Metals were below‐detection limits in surface waters but accumulated in sediments and plant tissues, with biota‐sediment accumulation factors > 1 for Mn, Ni and Co. Population demography indicated recruitment and positive growth, suggesting persistence under prevailing conditions. These findings document habitat‐specific biogeochemical attributes, but do not imply that they outweigh biodiversity concerns, establish conservation equivalence with native habitats or alter the invasive status of P. karka . Management should remain site‐specific: restoration, nutrient‐source reduction, hydrological rehabilitation, containment and removal should be prioritized where native‐community recovery is feasible or sensitive habitats are threatened. Monitored temporary retention may be considered only where restoration is constrained, risks to sensitive habitats and native communities are low and rapid removal could mobilize sediments, nutrients or contaminants. Decisions should remain conditional, reversible and periodically reassessed.

Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsVol. 36(10)
James Cook University (AU), Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar (IN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.