Somatic variant detection using an individual-specific pangenome reference: a case study of a pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patient

Background: Reference bias can cause false or missed somatic variant calls, also in clinically relevant genes. Pangenomes aim to reduce this bias, but evidence of their diagnostic benefit is lacking. We tested how an individual-specific pangenome affects somatic variant calling in bulk samples and single cells. Results: We built an individual-specific pangenome from Nanopore assemblies of normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells of a child with acute myeloid leukemia. We aligned short-read whole-genome sequencing data of bulk and single-cell samples to hg38 and to the pangenome, and called somatic variants with standard downstream tools after anchoring pangenome alignments to hg38. Single nucleotide variants were mostly shared, while indel calls unique to the pangenome were fewer than those unique to hg38, mostly in repeats. Both approaches detected NUP98-NSD1 and FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) drivers. The pangenome-based phylogeny showed more parallel branching in comparison to hg38-based tree. The pangenome removed three false-positive PRSS1 variants and, in single cells, frameshift insertion calls next to polyG and polyC repeats. However, surjection to hg38 coordinates split a WT1 driver indel call in a low-complexity region into two separate calls. Validation showed that all somatic structural variant calls, except NUP98-NSD1 and FLT3-ITD, were germline variants or artifacts. Conclusions: The use of individual-specific pangenome led to fewer false-positive indel and driver calls, mainly in repeats and single cells, and changed the branching of the inferred phylogeny. However, surjection artifacts and false-positive somatic structural variants show that pangenome-based results need read-level inspection and validation before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.27.756267
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Somatic variant detection using an individual-specific pangenome reference: a case study of a pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patient

Ruben van Boxtel, Lucca L. M. Derks, Rico Hagelaar, Pjotr Prins et al.
3 links
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
preprint

Somatic variant detection using an individual-specific pangenome reference: a case study of a pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patient

Ruben van Boxtel, Lucca L. M. Derks, Rico Hagelaar, Pjotr Prins, Andrea Guarracino, Sjors Middelkamp, Mark Verheul, Matteo Boretto, Laurianne Trabut, Arianne M. Brandsma, Eline J.M. Bertrums, Markus J. van Roosmalen, Elizaveta Kulaeva
preprint en

Abstract

Background: Reference bias can cause false or missed somatic variant calls, also in clinically relevant genes. Pangenomes aim to reduce this bias, but evidence of their diagnostic benefit is lacking. We tested how an individual-specific pangenome affects somatic variant calling in bulk samples and single cells. Results: We built an individual-specific pangenome from Nanopore assemblies of normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells of a child with acute myeloid leukemia. We aligned short-read whole-genome sequencing data of bulk and single-cell samples to hg38 and to the pangenome, and called somatic variants with standard downstream tools after anchoring pangenome alignments to hg38. Single nucleotide variants were mostly shared, while indel calls unique to the pangenome were fewer than those unique to hg38, mostly in repeats. Both approaches detected NUP98-NSD1 and FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) drivers. The pangenome-based phylogeny showed more parallel branching in comparison to hg38-based tree. The pangenome removed three false-positive PRSS1 variants and, in single cells, frameshift insertion calls next to polyG and polyC repeats. However, surjection to hg38 coordinates split a WT1 driver indel call in a low-complexity region into two separate calls. Validation showed that all somatic structural variant calls, except NUP98-NSD1 and FLT3-ITD, were germline variants or artifacts. Conclusions: The use of individual-specific pangenome led to fewer false-positive indel and driver calls, mainly in repeats and single cells, and changed the branching of the inferred phylogeny. However, surjection artifacts and false-positive somatic structural variants show that pangenome-based results need read-level inspection and validation before clinical use.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Translational Genomics Research Institute (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Utrecht University (NL), City of Hope (US), Oncode Institute (NL), Princess Máxima Center (NL)
New York Stem Cell Foundation, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Good health and well-being
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon