‘These people don’t float into hospital’: Australian paramedic perspectives on pre-hospital neck of femur fracture care

Objectives Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are a common and clinically significant presentation within paramedic practice, yet Australian paramedics currently manage these patients without dedicated evidence-informed pre-hospital guidelines. Previous quantitative research has identified variability in assessment and management practices, suggesting uncertainty surrounding care. This study explored how Australian paramedics perceive and navigate the pre-hospital management of suspected NOF fractures. Methods An exploratory qualitative design was undertaken using eight online focus groups with 21 registered paramedics, recruited from a preceding national survey. Discussions followed a semi-structured interview guide and were conducted via Zoom, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework method. Analysis was iterative and interpretive, with themes developed through sustained engagement with the data and reflexive discussion amongst the research team. Results Four themes were identified: (1) balancing rapid assessment with diagnostic uncertainty; (2) managing immediate care amid competing priorities and limited information; (3) sources, strengths and limitations of the existing knowledge base; and (4) envisioning clearer, evidence-informed guidance for future practice. Participants described NOF fracture care as shaped by uncertainty, experiential learning and contextual judgement rather than standardised guidance. Decision-making extended beyond clinical assessment alone to include ethical and patient-centred considerations regarding movement, communication, dignity and analgesia. Participants frequently described relying on tacit knowledge, peer learning and accumulated clinical experience to guide care in the absence of condition-specific pre-hospital guidance. Discussion revealed a shared perception that clearer evidence-informed guidance could support greater consistency, confidence and patient-centred care. Conclusions Australian paramedics describe NOF fracture management as a complex and interpretive practice shaped by uncertainty, experience and contextual decision-making. In the absence of dedicated guidance, paramedics rely heavily on experiential and relational forms of knowledge to navigate care. These findings highlight the need for evidence-informed pre-hospital guidance and educational support for NOF fracture management that better reflects the realities and complexities of paramedic practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Paramedicine
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386261492212
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

‘These people don’t float into hospital’: Australian paramedic perspectives on pre-hospital neck of femur fracture care

Steven J. Obst, Luke Heales, Emma Moore, Robert Stanton
Paramedicine
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

‘These people don’t float into hospital’: Australian paramedic perspectives on pre-hospital neck of femur fracture care

Steven J. Obst, Luke Heales, Emma Moore, Robert Stanton
article en

Abstract

Objectives Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are a common and clinically significant presentation within paramedic practice, yet Australian paramedics currently manage these patients without dedicated evidence-informed pre-hospital guidelines. Previous quantitative research has identified variability in assessment and management practices, suggesting uncertainty surrounding care. This study explored how Australian paramedics perceive and navigate the pre-hospital management of suspected NOF fractures. Methods An exploratory qualitative design was undertaken using eight online focus groups with 21 registered paramedics, recruited from a preceding national survey. Discussions followed a semi-structured interview guide and were conducted via Zoom, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework method. Analysis was iterative and interpretive, with themes developed through sustained engagement with the data and reflexive discussion amongst the research team. Results Four themes were identified: (1) balancing rapid assessment with diagnostic uncertainty; (2) managing immediate care amid competing priorities and limited information; (3) sources, strengths and limitations of the existing knowledge base; and (4) envisioning clearer, evidence-informed guidance for future practice. Participants described NOF fracture care as shaped by uncertainty, experiential learning and contextual judgement rather than standardised guidance. Decision-making extended beyond clinical assessment alone to include ethical and patient-centred considerations regarding movement, communication, dignity and analgesia. Participants frequently described relying on tacit knowledge, peer learning and accumulated clinical experience to guide care in the absence of condition-specific pre-hospital guidance. Discussion revealed a shared perception that clearer evidence-informed guidance could support greater consistency, confidence and patient-centred care. Conclusions Australian paramedics describe NOF fracture management as a complex and interpretive practice shaped by uncertainty, experience and contextual decision-making. In the absence of dedicated guidance, paramedics rely heavily on experiential and relational forms of knowledge to navigate care. These findings highlight the need for evidence-informed pre-hospital guidance and educational support for NOF fracture management that better reflects the realities and complexities of paramedic practice.

Paramedicine
Central Queensland University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.