Superbia
Superbia asks why the Christian tradition can call pride the beginning of every sin when many sins appear without vanity, boasting, or conscious self-exaltation. It argues that pride begins prior to height: in the creature’s installation of itself as the measure of what it was created to receive. The angelic fall provides the decisive case. Because an angel has no flesh, inherited temperament, or sensitive appetite, Lucifer’s pride shows that superbia cannot be reduced to bodily appetite or psychological formation; its possibility lies deeper, in created rational freedom and its capacity to treat as self-possession what can only be received as gift. Against this refusal stands Michael—Who is like God?—whose name expresses a contrary relation to creaturehood. The essay then traces this geometry through Eden, original sin, concupiscence, moral reception, and the several forms of vice, arguing that superbia is not merely one vice among others but the self made measure. It concludes Christologically: the answer to pride is not self-abasement but the humility of the incarnate Son, in whom being from another is shown not to imply inferiority.
Authors
- Oscar Gaitan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1904-4547)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23027409
- Primary Topic
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Type
- preprint