Association of diabetes medication adherence quality measure performance with A1c control among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services provide financial incentives for insurance plans demonstrating high-quality care to improve patient outcomes. Medicare Advantage (MA) plan performance is assessed by nearly 40 quality measures, with diabetes care heavily represented by 5 of those measures. Medication Adherence for Diabetes (MAD) and Hemoglobin A1c Control for Patients with Diabetes (HBD) are emphasized as triple-weighted measures that strongly impact the overall quality rating. The national average ratings for MA Prescription Drug (MA-PD) plans from 2022 to 2026 show a flat average pass rate 5 years in a row for the MAD measure but a steadily increasing pass rate each year for the HBD measure. Observation of this trend, along with rising 4- and 5-star cut points, raise questions about whether the MAD measure methodology currently contributes to the achievement of clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes and whether it guides health care resources to the population in need. OBJECTIVE: To identify the relationship between MAD performance and hemoglobin A1c (A1c) control. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the relationship between MAD and additional diabetes care quality measures and to evaluate factors associated with MAD measure performance. METHODS: tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Independent variables included demographic characteristics, health care use measures, prior-year MAD status, day-supply category, and index medication class; these factors were evaluated as predictors of MAD performance and included as covariates in adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of passing the MAD measure compared with monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: MAD performance was not independently associated with better glycemic control in our study population. The current proportion of days covered-based MAD measure methodology may not capture true medication adherence or its clinical impact and warrants reevaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.10.1201
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Association of diabetes medication adherence quality measure performance with A1c control among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries

Ismaeel U. Yunusa, Sarah Blandy, Regina Nwamaka Nechi, Victoria Hetherington et al.
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

Association of diabetes medication adherence quality measure performance with A1c control among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries

Ismaeel U. Yunusa, Sarah Blandy, Regina Nwamaka Nechi, Victoria Hetherington, Rachel C. Winters, Amanda S. Moyer, Casey Penland
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services provide financial incentives for insurance plans demonstrating high-quality care to improve patient outcomes. Medicare Advantage (MA) plan performance is assessed by nearly 40 quality measures, with diabetes care heavily represented by 5 of those measures. Medication Adherence for Diabetes (MAD) and Hemoglobin A1c Control for Patients with Diabetes (HBD) are emphasized as triple-weighted measures that strongly impact the overall quality rating. The national average ratings for MA Prescription Drug (MA-PD) plans from 2022 to 2026 show a flat average pass rate 5 years in a row for the MAD measure but a steadily increasing pass rate each year for the HBD measure. Observation of this trend, along with rising 4- and 5-star cut points, raise questions about whether the MAD measure methodology currently contributes to the achievement of clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes and whether it guides health care resources to the population in need. OBJECTIVE: To identify the relationship between MAD performance and hemoglobin A1c (A1c) control. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the relationship between MAD and additional diabetes care quality measures and to evaluate factors associated with MAD measure performance. METHODS: tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Independent variables included demographic characteristics, health care use measures, prior-year MAD status, day-supply category, and index medication class; these factors were evaluated as predictors of MAD performance and included as covariates in adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of passing the MAD measure compared with monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: MAD performance was not independently associated with better glycemic control in our study population. The current proportion of days covered-based MAD measure methodology may not capture true medication adherence or its clinical impact and warrants reevaluation.

Journal of Managed Care & Specialty PharmacyVol. 32(10)
Outcomes Research Consortium (US), Greenville Memorial Hospital (US), Health Outcomes Solutions (United States) (US), Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Diseases (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.