Perceived paradoxes between “home” and “away” in digital nomad livelihoods

Digital nomads appear to be living paradoxical livelihoods. While seeking freedom “away”, motivated by travel and social interaction, they remain tethered to “home” through work, culture and citizenship. This conceptual article reframes previously portrayed paradoxes into five tensions connected to leisure. First, work obstructs leisure, keeping individuals connected to home. Second, reliance on online spaces restricts the analogue experiences they sought to embrace. Third, citizenship enables travel while tying individuals to nation-states and, consequently, to “home”. Fourth, women, sexual and ethnic minorities seeking to find themselves “away” continue to face many of the same constraints they encounter at “home”. Finally, capitalist structures shape their livelihoods, constantly reminding them of “home” and contributing to stress. Future research on digital nomadism should theoretically explore how these tensions materialize. Methodologically, ethnographic approaches may generate new insight rather than relying solely on interlocutors’ own accounts. “Digital migrants”, those who become stationary, represent a particularly promising direction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Leisure Journal
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2026.2735043
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Perceived paradoxes between “home” and “away” in digital nomad livelihoods

Axel Eriksson
World Leisure Journal
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Perceived paradoxes between “home” and “away” in digital nomad livelihoods

Axel Eriksson
article en

Abstract

Digital nomads appear to be living paradoxical livelihoods. While seeking freedom “away”, motivated by travel and social interaction, they remain tethered to “home” through work, culture and citizenship. This conceptual article reframes previously portrayed paradoxes into five tensions connected to leisure. First, work obstructs leisure, keeping individuals connected to home. Second, reliance on online spaces restricts the analogue experiences they sought to embrace. Third, citizenship enables travel while tying individuals to nation-states and, consequently, to “home”. Fourth, women, sexual and ethnic minorities seeking to find themselves “away” continue to face many of the same constraints they encounter at “home”. Finally, capitalist structures shape their livelihoods, constantly reminding them of “home” and contributing to stress. Future research on digital nomadism should theoretically explore how these tensions materialize. Methodologically, ethnographic approaches may generate new insight rather than relying solely on interlocutors’ own accounts. “Digital migrants”, those who become stationary, represent a particularly promising direction.

World Leisure Journal
University of Central Florida (US)
Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.