PS6-7. Postmortem Examinations in Food Animal Production: Assessing Perceptions and Experience, Prior Training, and Perceived Barriers.

Abstract Effective livestock production requires collaboration between farm workers and veterinarians to ensure animal health, productivity, and food safety. Differences in training and professional experience among stakeholders may shape perceptions and implementation of Postmortem Examinations (PME). This study evaluated perceptions and experiences surrounding field-PME and prior training and hypothesized that these differ among stakeholders (farm workers, veterinarians & veterinary students). A semi-structured cross-sectional survey (22-items) was conducted among 29 dairy, and 17 feedlot farm workers, 23 food animal veterinarians and 33 fourth year veterinary students. The survey included multiple-choice questions (MCQs), Likert-scale items, and open-ended questions, allowing the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics in RStudio version 2025.09.2. Fisher's exact and Chi-square test results indicated significant associations (p < 0.001) between stakeholders and responses were observed for several survey questions, including prior-experience and prior-training-PME. Pairwise comparisons revealed that dairy respondents differed significantly from other stakeholders. Significant differences among stakeholders were also observed regarding perceived barriers to performing PME. Exploratory factor analysis revealed two underlying dimensions of perceived barriers: representing operational constraints and training-related limitations. Responses on the knowledge-of-procedure barrier differed significantly across sectors (Kruskal-Wallis χ²(3) = 27.39, p = 4.88 × 10-6, ε² = 0.30; n = 93). Similarly, responses on the lack-of-training barrier differed across sectors (χ² (3) = 21.71, p = 7.48 × 10⁻⁵, ε² = 0.25; n = 89). D dairy respondents consistently reported greater difficulty than other stakeholders. Study findings highlight the need for stakeholder-context-specific training strategies. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.400
Primary Topic
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

PS6-7. Postmortem Examinations in Food Animal Production: Assessing Perceptions and Experience, Prior Training, and Perceived Barriers.

Blaine T. Johnson, Linda Dascanio, Clinton J Roof, Sarah E. Hooper et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
article

PS6-7. Postmortem Examinations in Food Animal Production: Assessing Perceptions and Experience, Prior Training, and Perceived Barriers.

Blaine T. Johnson, Linda Dascanio, Clinton J Roof, Sarah E. Hooper, Elpida Artemiou, Michael J. Cruz Penn, Marcelo Schmidt, Guy H. Loneragan, Gizem Levent, Stephanie L. Myers, Nathaly B Vargas Arroyo, Howard Rodriguez Mori
article en

Abstract

Abstract Effective livestock production requires collaboration between farm workers and veterinarians to ensure animal health, productivity, and food safety. Differences in training and professional experience among stakeholders may shape perceptions and implementation of Postmortem Examinations (PME). This study evaluated perceptions and experiences surrounding field-PME and prior training and hypothesized that these differ among stakeholders (farm workers, veterinarians & veterinary students). A semi-structured cross-sectional survey (22-items) was conducted among 29 dairy, and 17 feedlot farm workers, 23 food animal veterinarians and 33 fourth year veterinary students. The survey included multiple-choice questions (MCQs), Likert-scale items, and open-ended questions, allowing the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics in RStudio version 2025.09.2. Fisher's exact and Chi-square test results indicated significant associations (p < 0.001) between stakeholders and responses were observed for several survey questions, including prior-experience and prior-training-PME. Pairwise comparisons revealed that dairy respondents differed significantly from other stakeholders. Significant differences among stakeholders were also observed regarding perceived barriers to performing PME. Exploratory factor analysis revealed two underlying dimensions of perceived barriers: representing operational constraints and training-related limitations. Responses on the knowledge-of-procedure barrier differed significantly across sectors (Kruskal-Wallis χ²(3) = 27.39, p = 4.88 × 10-6, ε² = 0.30; n = 93). Similarly, responses on the lack-of-training barrier differed across sectors (χ² (3) = 21.71, p = 7.48 × 10⁻⁵, ε² = 0.25; n = 89). D dairy respondents consistently reported greater difficulty than other stakeholders. Study findings highlight the need for stakeholder-context-specific training strategies. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_5)
Texas Tech University (US), Arkansas State University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.