featuretree: Verified Recovery of Editable CAD Feature Trees from STEP, for Open CAD Systems

Importing a STEP file into a parametric CAD system yields a single frozen solid: the design history is gone, and no pad depth or hole diameter can be edited. Recovering that history is a well-studied problem — the acceptance criterion used here was stated as a definition by Gupta and Nau in 1995, and commercial implementations have shipped since roughly 1998. It is nonetheless absent from every open-source CAD system and from every callable library we could find: the capability exists only inside proprietary seats costing thousands of dollars per year, with no API. This paper describes featuretree, an MIT-licensed, training-free recogniser that recovers an editable feature tree from an exact boundary representation, gates every recovery by re-executing the tree and comparing the result against the input, and emits into FreeCAD and Onshape — two systems with no import-time feature recognition at all. On the eleven-part NIST MBE PMI conformance corpus it returns an editable tree for all eleven parts, VERIFIED for 3 and PARTIAL for 8, with no incorrect tree accepted; recovered geometry overlaps its input by 97.6% IoU on average and by at least 93.5% on every part, measured without Boolean operations. We also report a negative result about the acceptance criterion itself: a volume-and-extent comparison lets over-cut and uncut material cancel, and when a stronger recogniser multiplied the candidates it accepted two parts that overlap their inputs by only 95.0% and 93.7%. The acceptance gate now also requires a Boolean-free two-sided IoU of 99.5%. No methodological novelty is claimed. The contribution is an available, honest implementation and a measured account of where it fails. A full prior-art scan is included in the software repository. Changes in version 3 (2026-09-29). Layered 2.5D recognition. Parts are also recognised as a stack of sketch-and-pad layers along each principal axis, split at perpendicular faces and at section-topology changes, with holes cut as vertical runs. Mean exactly-registered IoU over the corpus rises from 65.0% to 97.6%, and the worst part from 7.4% to 93.5%. The predicted failure, observed, and removed. Under the volume-and-extent gate, the new candidates produced two false accepts (CTC-03 at 95.0%, FTC-07 at 93.7% IoU). The gate now also requires IoU ≥ 99.5%, measured without Boolean operations; VERIFIED stays at 3 of 11 with no false accepts. When nothing verifies, the best-overlapping candidate is returned rather than the one closest on volume. IoU for every part is now a measurement under the recogniser's exact transform, not a lower bound. Design intent scored on all eleven parts against the designer's AP242 semantic PMI: 97 of 196 holes, 68 of 74 nominal sizes, 9 of 11 unit systems. New figure: every part, input beside recovered tree. New limitations: per-layer draft, one stack per part, recognition time (median 152 s). Reproducibility. Figures come from repository commit 270e60d, whose paper/figures/recovered/ holds every recovered tree they were measured on.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23035433
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

featuretree: Verified Recovery of Editable CAD Feature Trees from STEP, for Open CAD Systems

Daniel Newcome
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
preprint

featuretree: Verified Recovery of Editable CAD Feature Trees from STEP, for Open CAD Systems

Daniel Newcome
preprint en

Abstract

Importing a STEP file into a parametric CAD system yields a single frozen solid: the design history is gone, and no pad depth or hole diameter can be edited. Recovering that history is a well-studied problem — the acceptance criterion used here was stated as a definition by Gupta and Nau in 1995, and commercial implementations have shipped since roughly 1998. It is nonetheless absent from every open-source CAD system and from every callable library we could find: the capability exists only inside proprietary seats costing thousands of dollars per year, with no API. This paper describes featuretree, an MIT-licensed, training-free recogniser that recovers an editable feature tree from an exact boundary representation, gates every recovery by re-executing the tree and comparing the result against the input, and emits into FreeCAD and Onshape — two systems with no import-time feature recognition at all. On the eleven-part NIST MBE PMI conformance corpus it returns an editable tree for all eleven parts, VERIFIED for 3 and PARTIAL for 8, with no incorrect tree accepted; recovered geometry overlaps its input by 97.6% IoU on average and by at least 93.5% on every part, measured without Boolean operations. We also report a negative result about the acceptance criterion itself: a volume-and-extent comparison lets over-cut and uncut material cancel, and when a stronger recogniser multiplied the candidates it accepted two parts that overlap their inputs by only 95.0% and 93.7%. The acceptance gate now also requires a Boolean-free two-sided IoU of 99.5%. No methodological novelty is claimed. The contribution is an available, honest implementation and a measured account of where it fails. A full prior-art scan is included in the software repository. Changes in version 3 (2026-09-29). Layered 2.5D recognition. Parts are also recognised as a stack of sketch-and-pad layers along each principal axis, split at perpendicular faces and at section-topology changes, with holes cut as vertical runs. Mean exactly-registered IoU over the corpus rises from 65.0% to 97.6%, and the worst part from 7.4% to 93.5%. The predicted failure, observed, and removed. Under the volume-and-extent gate, the new candidates produced two false accepts (CTC-03 at 95.0%, FTC-07 at 93.7% IoU). The gate now also requires IoU ≥ 99.5%, measured without Boolean operations; VERIFIED stays at 3 of 11 with no false accepts. When nothing verifies, the best-overlapping candidate is returned rather than the one closest on volume. IoU for every part is now a measurement under the recogniser's exact transform, not a lower bound. Design intent scored on all eleven parts against the designer's AP242 semantic PMI: 97 of 196 holes, 68 of 74 nominal sizes, 9 of 11 unit systems. New figure: every part, input beside recovered tree. New limitations: per-layer draft, one stack per part, recognition time (median 152 s). Reproducibility. Figures come from repository commit 270e60d, whose paper/figures/recovered/ holds every recovered tree they were measured on.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.