No detectable impact of short-term feral cat control: two case studies on shooting as a management tool in northern Australian savannas

Context Feral cats (Felis catus) are a significant threat to biodiversity in Australia’s northern savannas. Direct control methods can be employed alongside indirect controls such as habitat modification through fire and feral herbivore management. However, the effectiveness of intensive short-term lethal control in reducing feral cat numbers remains unclear. Aims This study assessed the effectiveness of targeted shooting as a feral cat control measure at two large properties in northern Australia, namely, Yampi Sound Training Area (YSTA) and Piccaninny Plains Wildlife Sanctuary (PP). Specifically, we tested whether short-term intensive shooting significantly reduces feral cat activity and density in northern Australian savannas. Methods Camera-trap arrays were deployed at treatment (n = 3) and control (n = 2) sites at the two locations to monitor feral cats over two 12-day periods before and after targeted control activities (i.e. shooting). Individual cats were identified from images. Generalised linear mixed models (GLMM) and Allen’s index were employed to analyse activity changes, and spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) analyses were used to estimate cat density. Key results At YSTA, 25 cats were removed across two treatment sites (16 and 9 respectively) over 11 nights, whereas at PP, 12 cats were removed at one treatment site over six nights. These efforts resulted in no significant reduction in feral cat activity or density at treatment sites. However, the short monitoring duration affected accuracy of density estimates and should be interpreted cautiously. Conclusions Short-term intensive shooting did not produce measurable reductions in feral cat activity at our treatment sites. These findings suggest that this method of direct lethal control alone is unlikely to achieve sustained feral cat population reductions, particularly in open landscapes such as northern Australian savannas. Implications These findings highlight the substantial limitations and resource demands of short-term intensive shooting as a feral cat management method. Effective feral cat control strategies in open ecosystems are likely to require integrated, sustained, and adaptive management. Future research should explore long-term management strategies and account for ecological and behavioural factors influencing feral cat populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Research
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wr25115
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

No detectable impact of short-term feral cat control: two case studies on shooting as a management tool in northern Australian savannas

Abhilasha Aiyer, Erin Liddell, Helena S. Stokes, Jake Barker et al.
Wildlife Research
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

No detectable impact of short-term feral cat control: two case studies on shooting as a management tool in northern Australian savannas

Abhilasha Aiyer, Erin Liddell, Helena S. Stokes, Jake Barker, Pippa L. Kern, Ana Cristina Palma, Skye F. Cameron, Sanne Boland, Alexander Watson, Braden Riles, Raoul Ribot
article en

Abstract

Context Feral cats (Felis catus) are a significant threat to biodiversity in Australia’s northern savannas. Direct control methods can be employed alongside indirect controls such as habitat modification through fire and feral herbivore management. However, the effectiveness of intensive short-term lethal control in reducing feral cat numbers remains unclear. Aims This study assessed the effectiveness of targeted shooting as a feral cat control measure at two large properties in northern Australia, namely, Yampi Sound Training Area (YSTA) and Piccaninny Plains Wildlife Sanctuary (PP). Specifically, we tested whether short-term intensive shooting significantly reduces feral cat activity and density in northern Australian savannas. Methods Camera-trap arrays were deployed at treatment (n = 3) and control (n = 2) sites at the two locations to monitor feral cats over two 12-day periods before and after targeted control activities (i.e. shooting). Individual cats were identified from images. Generalised linear mixed models (GLMM) and Allen’s index were employed to analyse activity changes, and spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) analyses were used to estimate cat density. Key results At YSTA, 25 cats were removed across two treatment sites (16 and 9 respectively) over 11 nights, whereas at PP, 12 cats were removed at one treatment site over six nights. These efforts resulted in no significant reduction in feral cat activity or density at treatment sites. However, the short monitoring duration affected accuracy of density estimates and should be interpreted cautiously. Conclusions Short-term intensive shooting did not produce measurable reductions in feral cat activity at our treatment sites. These findings suggest that this method of direct lethal control alone is unlikely to achieve sustained feral cat population reductions, particularly in open landscapes such as northern Australian savannas. Implications These findings highlight the substantial limitations and resource demands of short-term intensive shooting as a feral cat management method. Effective feral cat control strategies in open ecosystems are likely to require integrated, sustained, and adaptive management. Future research should explore long-term management strategies and account for ecological and behavioural factors influencing feral cat populations.

Wildlife ResearchVol. 53(10)
Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AU), Murdoch University (AU), Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.