Edge Electrostatic Inhomogeneity Correlates with Hysteresis and Localized Charging in Lithographically Defined Graphene Nanoribbon Devices

Abstract Lithographically defined graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) are attractive for graphene nanoelectronics and single-electron devices, but their performance is often limited by edge roughness, polymer residues, adsorbates, and graphene/SiO2 interfacial traps introduced during top-down processing. Here, we correlate process-defined edge disorder with local electrostatic inhomogeneity and transport stability in geometry-matched GNR devices containing a fixed central graphene island and 150, 100, or 50 nm constrictions. Smooth and rough edge classes, with representative edge roughnesses of ≈3 and ≈15 nm, respectively, are characterized by AFM, TEM, Raman spectroscopy, Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), and temperature-dependent electrical transport. Controlled KPFM measurements, including dry-N2 controls, show that rough ribbons exhibit larger edge–basal contact-potential contrast and stronger along-edge potential fluctuations than smooth ribbons, consistent with enhanced edge-localized electrostatic disorder. These electrostatic differences correlate with broader gate-sweep hysteresis, lower transport stability, and larger effective trap signatures. Low-temperature bias spectroscopy further shows that smooth 50 nm devices exhibit cleaner localized-charging features with effective addition-energy scales up to ≈128 meV, whereas rough 50 nm devices show irregular disorder-dominated blockade features consistent with coupled puddles or multiple localized islands and a lower effective blockade energy scale of ≈4.3 meV. Across the width series, normalized roughness organizes systematic trends in mobility, on/off ratio, hysteresis, and electrostatic contrast, linking process-defined edge morphology to device-level transport response. These results establish a proof-of-concept correlation in which KPFM-derived edge electrostatic inhomogeneity, reflecting the combined process-defined edge/near-edge environment, tracks gate-sweep hysteresis and low-temperature charging behavior, identifying it as a candidate pre-cryogenic screening descriptor for lithographically patterned GNR devices and motivating validation on larger device cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6c11325
Primary Topic
Graphene research and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Edge Electrostatic Inhomogeneity Correlates with Hysteresis and Localized Charging in Lithographically Defined Graphene Nanoribbon Devices

Sreeprasad Theruvakkattil Sreenivasan, Kavish Saini
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Graphene research and applications
article

Edge Electrostatic Inhomogeneity Correlates with Hysteresis and Localized Charging in Lithographically Defined Graphene Nanoribbon Devices

Sreeprasad Theruvakkattil Sreenivasan, Kavish Saini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Lithographically defined graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) are attractive for graphene nanoelectronics and single-electron devices, but their performance is often limited by edge roughness, polymer residues, adsorbates, and graphene/SiO2 interfacial traps introduced during top-down processing. Here, we correlate process-defined edge disorder with local electrostatic inhomogeneity and transport stability in geometry-matched GNR devices containing a fixed central graphene island and 150, 100, or 50 nm constrictions. Smooth and rough edge classes, with representative edge roughnesses of ≈3 and ≈15 nm, respectively, are characterized by AFM, TEM, Raman spectroscopy, Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), and temperature-dependent electrical transport. Controlled KPFM measurements, including dry-N2 controls, show that rough ribbons exhibit larger edge–basal contact-potential contrast and stronger along-edge potential fluctuations than smooth ribbons, consistent with enhanced edge-localized electrostatic disorder. These electrostatic differences correlate with broader gate-sweep hysteresis, lower transport stability, and larger effective trap signatures. Low-temperature bias spectroscopy further shows that smooth 50 nm devices exhibit cleaner localized-charging features with effective addition-energy scales up to ≈128 meV, whereas rough 50 nm devices show irregular disorder-dominated blockade features consistent with coupled puddles or multiple localized islands and a lower effective blockade energy scale of ≈4.3 meV. Across the width series, normalized roughness organizes systematic trends in mobility, on/off ratio, hysteresis, and electrostatic contrast, linking process-defined edge morphology to device-level transport response. These results establish a proof-of-concept correlation in which KPFM-derived edge electrostatic inhomogeneity, reflecting the combined process-defined edge/near-edge environment, tracks gate-sweep hysteresis and low-temperature charging behavior, identifying it as a candidate pre-cryogenic screening descriptor for lithographically patterned GNR devices and motivating validation on larger device cohorts.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Graphene research and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.