PS3-25. Visceral Organ Mass and Gastrointestinal Development of Cattle from Different Production Systems.

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate visceral organ mass and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) development of cattle from different production systems under feedlot conditions. Ninety-six cattle (195 ± 17.45 kg initial BW) were assigned to four production systems: Nellore bulls (NEL), dairy-origin crossbred bulls (DC), Holstein steers (HOL), and Nellore × Angus steers (ANG). Animals were distributed in a randomized block design with eight pens per production system. During the growing phase, pens were composed of three animals each, and pen was considered the experimental unit. Animals were fed sequential diets throughout the experiment, transitioning from forage-based diets during the growing phases to a high-concentrate diet during finishing. At the end of the second growing phase, one animal per pen was slaughtered for organ evaluation, and the remaining animals were redistributed (two animals per pen) for the finishing phase. Organ measurements were obtained from one animal per pen. Total GIT mass differed among production systems, with HOL steers presenting greater GIT full weight compared with the other groups (84.4 vs. 58.9, 59.1, and 68.8 kg for DC, NEL, and ANG, respectively; P < 0.001). Similarly, GIT empty weight was greater for HOL steers (52.1 vs. 35.6 to 39.0 kg; P < 0.001), as well as GIT relative to body weight (16.0 vs. 11.6 to 12.8% of BW; P < 0.001). Reticulorumen (8.68 vs. 6.71 to 7.54 kg; P = 0.0012), omasum (4.17 vs. 2.16 to 3.22 kg; P < 0.001), and abomasum weights (1.39 vs. 0.99 to 1.04 kg; P = 0.040) were also greater for HOL steers. Small intestine mass was greater for HOL and ANG compared with NEL (5.04 and 4.68 vs. 3.58 kg; P = 0.0037), whereas large intestine weight did not differ (P = 0.65). Mesenteric fat was greater for HOL steers compared with the other production systems (29.5 vs. 17.6 to 19.5 kg; P < 0.001). Spleen weight tended to differ (P = 0.071), whereas small intestine length was not affected (P = 0.45). These results demonstrate that production systems influence visceral organ mass and gastrointestinal development, with Holstein steers presenting greater GIT mass and visceral tissue deposition, which may be associated with increased metabolic activity and maintenance energy requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.612
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

PS3-25. Visceral Organ Mass and Gastrointestinal Development of Cattle from Different Production Systems.

Tathyane Ramalho Santos Gionbelli, Mateus Pies Gionbelli, Felipe C. Maciel, Gabriel R Neiva et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

PS3-25. Visceral Organ Mass and Gastrointestinal Development of Cattle from Different Production Systems.

Tathyane Ramalho Santos Gionbelli, Mateus Pies Gionbelli, Felipe C. Maciel, Gabriel R Neiva, Miguel F Dias
article en

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate visceral organ mass and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) development of cattle from different production systems under feedlot conditions. Ninety-six cattle (195 ± 17.45 kg initial BW) were assigned to four production systems: Nellore bulls (NEL), dairy-origin crossbred bulls (DC), Holstein steers (HOL), and Nellore × Angus steers (ANG). Animals were distributed in a randomized block design with eight pens per production system. During the growing phase, pens were composed of three animals each, and pen was considered the experimental unit. Animals were fed sequential diets throughout the experiment, transitioning from forage-based diets during the growing phases to a high-concentrate diet during finishing. At the end of the second growing phase, one animal per pen was slaughtered for organ evaluation, and the remaining animals were redistributed (two animals per pen) for the finishing phase. Organ measurements were obtained from one animal per pen. Total GIT mass differed among production systems, with HOL steers presenting greater GIT full weight compared with the other groups (84.4 vs. 58.9, 59.1, and 68.8 kg for DC, NEL, and ANG, respectively; P < 0.001). Similarly, GIT empty weight was greater for HOL steers (52.1 vs. 35.6 to 39.0 kg; P < 0.001), as well as GIT relative to body weight (16.0 vs. 11.6 to 12.8% of BW; P < 0.001). Reticulorumen (8.68 vs. 6.71 to 7.54 kg; P = 0.0012), omasum (4.17 vs. 2.16 to 3.22 kg; P < 0.001), and abomasum weights (1.39 vs. 0.99 to 1.04 kg; P = 0.040) were also greater for HOL steers. Small intestine mass was greater for HOL and ANG compared with NEL (5.04 and 4.68 vs. 3.58 kg; P = 0.0037), whereas large intestine weight did not differ (P = 0.65). Mesenteric fat was greater for HOL steers compared with the other production systems (29.5 vs. 17.6 to 19.5 kg; P < 0.001). Spleen weight tended to differ (P = 0.071), whereas small intestine length was not affected (P = 0.45). These results demonstrate that production systems influence visceral organ mass and gastrointestinal development, with Holstein steers presenting greater GIT mass and visceral tissue deposition, which may be associated with increased metabolic activity and maintenance energy requirements.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_5)
Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.